Re: [Qgis-user] Question about results of Union in QGIS

2016-10-26 Thread Matthias Kuhn
> *To:* SEGGIE Graeme > *Cc:* Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org > *Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] Question about results of Union in QGIS > > may you test using 2.14? if I well remember that version suffered a > severe regression on ftools geoprocessing modules due the introduct

Re: [Qgis-user] Question about results of Union in QGIS

2016-10-25 Thread SEGGIE Graeme
[Qgis-user] Question about results of Union in QGIS may you test using 2.14? if I well remember that version suffered a severe regression on ftools geoprocessing modules due the introduction of the new 3d geometry. During the hackmeeting in Gran Canaria we seriously though to announce the depre

Re: [Qgis-user] Question about results of Union in QGIS

2016-10-25 Thread Luigi Pirelli
may you test using 2.14? if I well remember that version suffered a severe regression on ftools geoprocessing modules due the introduction of the new 3d geometry. During the hackmeeting in Gran Canaria we seriously though to announce the deprecation of that version, but a fix was found => and a

[Qgis-user] Question about results of Union in QGIS

2016-10-25 Thread SEGGIE Graeme
Hello, I was doing some analysis on UNION against the same feature (on itself) to get an understanding of what happens with slivers and overlaps. I started in ArcGIS and was able to understand what happened with the combinations available there as follows: Zone system used as input features