, March 31, 2015 5:15 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
I totally agree with you... but I'm not the mantainer of this code :)
I think that a nre ticket is not necessary. Yuo could add new
suggestions/ideas to the existing one.
giovanni
2015-03-27 10:04 GMT+01:00 Peter Borissow
Wow, this is great news! I can't wait to test it.
Thanks for your help!
Peter
From: Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch
To: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org; peter.boris...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
Hi all
*To:* qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org; peter.boris...@yahoo.com
*Sent:* Thursday, April 2, 2015 11:34 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
Hi all
I've added the checkbox to only load the features intersecting the current
extent (
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit
gioha...@gmail.com
To: Peter Borissow peter.boris...@yahoo.com
Cc: t...@wildintellect.com t...@wildintellect.com;
qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 6:26 AM
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
The next release (2.10) will be the 26th
;
qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 5:15 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
I totally agree with you... but I'm not the mantainer of this code :)
I think that a nre ticket is not necessary. Yuo could add new
suggestions/ideas
;
qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 5:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
I totally agree with you... but I'm not the mantainer of this code :)I think
that a nre ticket is not necessary. Yuo could add new suggestions/ideas
-user@lists.osgeo.org qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 5:15 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
I totally agree with you... but I'm not the mantainer of this code :)
I think that a nre ticket is not necessary. Yuo could add new
suggestions/ideas
:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
That's exactly how I would expect it to work.
To cache a whole WFS and start seems overboard, in that case why
wouldn't you just download the data set. BBOX is a must for web services
as a main part of the purpose is to allow users to only grab the part
: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
That's exactly how I would expect it to work.
To cache a whole WFS and start seems overboard, in that case why
wouldn't you just download the data set. BBOX is a must for web services
as a main part of the purpose is to allow users to only grab the part
As Marco explained in the realted post on qgis-dev the bbox filter should
be used if cahce features option is turned off, but at the moment it
seems broken, maybe because of new improvements in the rendering process.
The issue has been already reported in http://hub.qgis.org/issues/11968
In the
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
As Marco explained in the realted post on qgis-dev the bbox filter should be
used if cahce features option is turned off, but at the moment it seems
broken, maybe because of new improvements in the rendering process. The issue
has been
It's an intereseting question Peter.
I've verified that the wfs provider still requests the whole data the first
time, then it stores eveything (and create a spatial index for subsequent
calls).
I suppose that sponsoring this feature could be the right way to have it,
but I'm curious to know what
Sorry for being impatient but I was wondering if anyone can shed some light on
this issue.
I have a WFS that's serving out over a billion features (several million
records per layer). When I add a layer from the WFS into QGIS, it calls
DescribeFeature and then GetFeature without a BBOX filter.
Hello- I noticed that the WFS client in QGIS 2.8 and 2.6 do not seem to pass
a bbox filter when requesting features.
It seems that in the past, QGIS had an option to only fetch features that
intersect the current map extent:
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/1421
Based on this thread, it looks
14 matches
Mail list logo
