Re: [Qgis-user] QGIS releases announced too early IMHO

I agree, but why not wait with the "official" release message until after KyngChaos has done his (excellent, can't thank him enough) job? Barend On 02/03/16 13:33, "Nathan Woodrow" > wrote: Hi, It would be ideal however packages are

Re: [Qgis-user] QGIS releases announced too early IMHO

s Brent Wood From: "b.j.kob...@utwente.nl" <b.j.kob...@utwente.nl> To: madman...@gmail.com Cc: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:28 AM Subject: [Qgis-user] QGIS releases announced too early IMHO Hi Nathan, You state that "There is no &

Re: [Qgis-user] QGIS releases announced too early IMHO

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Jürgen E. wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > On Wed, 02. Mar 2016 at 22:33:28 +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > > I suspect in the future we will have build bots for each platform but at > this > > point OS X is still the outliner and requires some domain

Re: [Qgis-user] QGIS releases announced too early IMHO

Hi Nathan, On Wed, 02. Mar 2016 at 22:33:28 +1000, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > I suspect in the future we will have build bots for each platform but at this > point OS X is still the outliner and requires some domain knowledge for > packaging only a few have. First of all it requires a Mac. Jürgen

Re: [Qgis-user] QGIS releases announced too early IMHO

Hi, It would be ideal however packages are maintained by different people due to the complexity of said task. Windows and major linux distros are done by Jurgen our release manager, hence why they come out right on time. I suspect in the future we will have build bots for each platform but at

[Qgis-user] QGIS releases announced too early IMHO

Hi Nathan, You state that "There is no "official" release until the banner is changed on qgis.org and announcement is made on the mailing lists/twitter, etc.". Well, that has happened now, but the KyngChaos site for Mac OSX still has 2.12. That is NOT a negative comment on