Dear all,
I tried to join a .csv and .dbf table (table1 with FieldA and FieldB) with
a shapefile with Field A and Field B. The joined fields in the resulting
shapefile were named table1FieldA and table2FieldB. In previous versions
QGIS simply added FieldA and FieldB. Is this the new and intended
Hi Filipe
Yes, it is intended behaviour to better distinguish fields with the same
names. Maybe it would be better to add the table name last, then it
would get trimmed away?
Regards,
Marco
On 23.11.2012 09:49, Filipe Dias wrote:
Dear all,
I tried to join a .csv and .dbf table (table1
Hi Marco
Yes I think it is better that way. And how about adding a small suffix (eg.
_a or _j) instead of the name of the table? If the field's names are
small enough it would still be possible to distinguish between original
and joined fields.
Tks
Regards
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Marco
