Hi,
I wonder why this is not the default? If a .cpg file is present, one can
assume that the information is correct. Probably in some edge cases it
may be false, but in the majority I assume the .cpg files to contain
correct information.
Andreas
On 2016-07-07 16:17, Claas Leiner wrote:
>
Hi,
QGIS uses the .cpg file when you deselect the Option "Ignore shapefile
encoding declaration"
You find it:
Settings > Options > Data Sources
Then there are no encoding-problems tu use QGIS with Shapefiles in in a
mixed environment.
Cheers
Claas
--
Hi Even,
the encoding is often a source of confusion. I work in a mixed
environment, me on Linux (so UTF-8 is the "System"-default), the rest is
using on Windows (with Windows-1252 I assume)
Transfering shapes often results in crippled data, and I have not found
workflows/settings that
Le jeudi 07 juillet 2016 12:16:17, Andrea Peri a écrit :
> Hi,
> I have some shapefiles with an extra file having extension .cpg.
> The .cpg extension is a optional extension for declaration of Code-Page.
> Is this file knowed and supported from QGIS 2.14. ?
>
> I don't know if the qgis when
Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Im Auftrag von
>> Andrea Peri
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 12:16
>> An: qgis-user
>> Betreff: [Qgis-user] Shapefile with file .cpg(codepage)
>>
>> Hi,
&
[mailto:qgis-user-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Im Auftrag von
> Andrea Peri
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 12:16
> An: qgis-user
> Betreff: [Qgis-user] Shapefile with file .cpg(codepage)
>
> Hi,
> I have some shapefiles with an extra file having extension .cpg.
> The .cpg ext
Hi,
I have some shapefiles with an extra file having extension .cpg.
The .cpg extension is a optional extension for declaration of Code-Page.
Is this file knowed and supported from QGIS 2.14. ?
I don't know if the qgis when loading a shapefile is using the ogr or
instead is using an own shapefile