Il 17/11/2016 14:34, Karl-Magnus Jönsson ha scritto: > Just curious if everyone thinks that moving everything to processing is > the best solutions for everything. I’m want correct geometries in our > PostGIS database and want also my not that experienced GIS users to > check geometry before saving. The old tool in QGIS 2.14 creates a simple > list of every error. By clicking on the error you get zoomed to the > error. You correct the error and then hit the OK button to rerun the > evaluation and get an new hopefully smaller list and save the edits. A > smooth workflow. I suppose the new tool in processing does the same. But > it’s more difficult. It pollutes your project with temporary layers for > every run. And it is more clicking to find the errors. Or is there a > better way to do this? I guess that if you do a lot of data > manipulation/analysis/processing with input and output data this is a > good approach but my focus is more often maintaining/updating/editing > data. Then it gets more complicated.
Hi Karl, this seems a reasonable thought to me. Could you please forward it to qgis-dev, where more people can authoritatively comment on this? All the best, and thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user