Marcel Kilgus writes:
>> A friend of mine may just have won his court case thanks to an SMS he had
>> the foresight to keep! (Mine are more likely to get me into trouble, but
>> what the hell! Id like to keep them all the same ;)
>
> Wow. I mean even I can send any text message with any sender-num
Thanks Tony re:
the gnokii software and a serial interface. (http://bryns.org.uk)
===
David wrote -
Whilst on the subject, are the angels dancing on the head of my pin male or
female ?
=
Has it been hissed
That the jist
Of this list
Has been missed?
Whatever happened to 'QL-Chat
At 10:23 29/05/2006 +0100, you wrote:
>As I thought, but shirley "you and I", the subject of the missing/implicit
>verb is plural (together as one pronoun: "we") and so would use "are" and
>not "am"?
Ah I see what you mean - "You and I" is the plural.
Since the verbs are invisible how can you t
At 11:53 28/05/2006 +0100, you wrote:
>This one has a blutooth COM port, but for some unfathomable reason it has
>set its heart on COM10!. Will check if other software has grabbed the lower
>ports and try to change it.
I was troubled for ages with instalations of W98 only providing COMMS 1 & 2
a
Hi,
sure: 17th of June
(also published in current issue of QL Today, which went to the post
on Saturday/today, depending on destination)
Cheers Jochen
François Van Emelen wrote:
> Hi,
> Can someone tell me when the next QL meeting in Eindhoven wiil take place?
> François Van Emelen
> ___
Hi,
Can someone tell me when the next QL meeting in Eindhoven wiil take place?
François Van Emelen
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Robert Newson wrote:
> Tony Firshman wrote:
>
> ...
>
Indeed, but not completely - it would be "I am" not "I are".
>>> As in "She is nicer than you and I am"? Surely it's "we are" not "we am".
>>> I was referring to the 'correct' "She is nicer than than you and I" (are)
>
> As I thoug
hitchies wrote:
> Per writes -
>
> A friend of mine may just have won his court case thanks to an SMS he had
> the foresight to keep! (Mine are more likely to get me into trouble, but
> what the hell! Id like to keep them all the same ;)
> ===
>
> Without interface software (for my Nokia
Robert wrote -
As I thought, but shirley "you and I", the subject of the missing/implicit
verb is plural (together as one pronoun: "we") and so would use "are" and
not "am"?
=
I bet I'm not the only one what would like to meet shirley!
What fun ;)
John in Wales
--
No virus found i
Per writes -
A friend of mine may just have won his court case thanks to an SMS he had
the foresight to keep! (Mine are more likely to get me into trouble, but
what the hell! Id like to keep them all the same ;)
===
Without interface software (for my Nokia 1100) I was glad I archived cert
Tony Firshman wrote:
...
>>>Indeed, but not completely - it would be "I am" not "I are".
>>>
>>As in "She is nicer than you and I am"? Surely it's "we are" not "we am".
>>I was referring to the 'correct' "She is nicer than than you and I" (are)
As I thought, but shirley "you and I", the subject
Robert Newson wrote:
> Tony Firshman wrote:
>
> ...
>>> She is nicer than me and you /are/.
>>>
>>> Now you see why it's wrong.
>>>
>> Indeed, but not completely - it would be "I am" not "I are".
>
> As in "She is nicer than you and I am"? Surely it's "we are" not "we am".
> I was referring
12 matches
Mail list logo
