- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Asus EeePc Benchmarks
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, P Witte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi Per,
It seems like you are the "geezer" to
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Cadman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Asus EeePc Benchmarks
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, P Witte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi Per,
It seems like you are the "geezer" to
Comparative Benchmarks
20080512
1 2345
| eee | NB | PC | QXL | SGC/Au|
# C68 Dhrystone v2.1
ms/DS | 47| 24|10.6| - |- |
DS/s | 21,115| 41
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, P Witte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Hi Norman,
Interesting all of this ... just shows that given a challenge there is
still someone prepared to experiment with computer equipment ... :-)
Norman Dunbar wrote:
Evening all,
What you should have is:
* tin
Jimmy writes:
Hi Per,
Stock speed of the EEE PC is 630 Mhz as Asus decide to downgrade bus speed to
70 Mhz instead it's nominal
100 MHz speed.
This can be tweaking by overclocking as I've do it under Windows.
But there is some problems doing this :
- Battery life is incredible less (about ha
text into your favourite plain text editor)
eee Comparative Benchmarks
20080512
1 2345
| eee | NB | PC | QXL | SGC/Au|
#
your favourite plain text editor)
eee Comparative Benchmarks
20080512
1 2345
| eee | NB | PC | QXL | SGC/Au|
# C68
