Re: [Ql-Users] BogoMIPS benchmarks

Am 08.02.2016 19:15, schrieb Marcos Cruz: > > Some interesting BogoMIPS benchmarks from the Spanish QL Forum > (http://foro.speccy.org/viewtopic.php?f=15=4687): > > QL with GoldCard (1): > 1.62, 1.62, 1.62, ... > > QL with SuperGoldCard (2) : > 5.83, 5.83, 5.83, ... > > QemuLator (3): > 96.55,

[Ql-Users] BogoMIPS benchmarks

Some interesting BogoMIPS benchmarks from the Spanish QL Forum (http://foro.speccy.org/viewtopic.php?f=15=4687): QL with GoldCard (1): 1.62, 1.62, 1.62, ... QL with SuperGoldCard (2) : 5.83, 5.83, 5.83, ... QemuLator (3): 96.55, 97.25, 96.55, 97.61, 97.08 QPC2 (3): 123.56, 123.98, 123.56,

Re: [Ql-Users] BogoMIPS benchmarks

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:15:43 +0100, Marcos Cruz wrote: > Some interesting BogoMIPS benchmarks from the Spanish QL Forum > (http://foro.speccy.org/viewtopic.php?f=15=4687): > > QL with GoldCard (1): > 1.62, 1.62, 1.62, ... > > QL with SuperGoldCard (2) : > 5.83, 5.83, 5.83, ... > > QemuLator

Re: [Ql-Users] BogoMIPS benchmarks

Am 08.02.2016 20:14, schrieb Marcos Cruz: > En/Je/On 2016-02-08 19:59, Peter Graf escribió / skribis / wrote : > >> But BogoMIPS is not really a benchmark, the PC probably outperforms the >> Q60 in practice. > > Is "CPU speed test" the right term? Yes, it is a measurement of CPU speed made by