Re: [Ql-Users] smsqe3 v 3.26 and smulator

2016-04-28 Thread Wolf
Hi, yes, sorry about that. I've updated the binaries zipfile on the SMSQE website. I also just uploaded SMSQmulator v. 2.19 with a certain number of bugfixes. Support for the Java 6 version of SMSQmulator has now been discontinued. Have fun! Wolfgang On 04/28/2016 02:48 PM, David

Re: [Ql-Users] smsqe3 v 3.26 and smulator

2016-04-28 Thread Fabrizio Diversi
Ciao, same here, SMSQmulator 2.18 on Mac Book Pro, after launch it i got a black window with SMSQe 3.26, revert to 3.25 then. Fabrizio On 28/04/16 14:48, David Gilham wrote: I just download the binaries for smsq3.26 Unless I have done some thing nstupid It wolud appear that the binary for

[Ql-Users] smsqe3 v 3.26 and smulator

2016-04-28 Thread David Gilham
I just download the binaries for smsq3.26 Unless I have done some thing nstupid It wolud appear that the binary for SMQmulator seems not to work needeing me log out version 3.25 of SMSQE works ok I am using full screen mode and hi colour in my configuration. My setup is an IBM Thinkpad running

Re: [Ql-Users] DBAS source code

2016-04-28 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
Hi Bob, > Time is the big factor. > And I know DD has advantages over DBAS but it's also more complex. > And a switch has already partly been done but somehow other projects > keep coming to the top of the pile. > > Bob > yeah, I know how it is Wolfgang

Re: [Ql-Users] DBAS source code

2016-04-28 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:20:51 +0200 schreef Derek Stewart : Hi Bob, The main problem with the DBAS package was the lack of source code. I think that bug fixes were done from disassembles of the original code. This is a great pity, as DBAS was one of the best packages around for

Re: [Ql-Users] DBAS source code

2016-04-28 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
Hi, Datadesign is pretty good, and I believe its source code is available, if necessary. Perhaps time to switch? Wolfgang > Hi Bob, > > The main problem with the DBAS package was the lack of source code. > > I think that bug fixes were done from disassembles of the original code. > > This