Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

017 um 12:07 schrieb Derek Stewart: > >> On 11/04/17 09:58, Ralf Reköndt wrote: >> >>> Yes, would be interesting to know, how QLib does this with its compiled >>> "resident" extensions. >>> >>> Ralf >>> >>> -Original-Nac

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

extensions. Ralf -Original-Nachricht- Betreff: Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 Datum: 2017-04-11T10:47:36+0200 Von: "Jan Bredenbeek" On 11 April 2017 at 10:07, Derek Stewart <de...@q40.de> wrote: Hi Marcel, Do you think it is possible for the SMSQ/E

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Il 11 apr 2017 10:47, "Jan Bredenbeek" ha scritto: On 11 April 2017 at 10:07, Derek Stewart wrote: Hi Marcel, > > Do you think it is possible for the SMSQ/E internal compiler produce a > compiled version of the SBASIC programme? You can EXEC a SBASIC

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

On 11/04/17 09:58, Ralf Reköndt wrote: Yes, would be interesting to know, how QLib does this with its compiled "resident" extensions. Ralf -Original-Nachricht- Betreff: Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 Datum: 2017-04-11T10:47:36+0200 Von: "Jan Bre

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Jan Bredenbeek wrote: > Nevertheless it would be a great idea if you could write a procedure in > SBASIC and LRESPR the compiled code as SBASIC extension so you have it > always available. AFAIK there is no higher-level language compiler capable > of producing SBASIC extensions - or perhaps

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Derek Stewart wrote: > Do you think it is possible for the SMSQ/E internal compiler produce a > compiled version of the SBASIC programme? Perhaps it's possible, but I don't see a use case for it as there is already QLiberator and Turbo for that. And Turbo is probably faster. Marcel

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Francois Lanciault wrote: > With all those discussions about bug correction and the good, > benevolent people who spend time to hunt them down, I wonder : > > Is there a proper way to report bugs in SMSQ/E ? > > Does asking kindly on this list enough ? :-) Yeah, that is probably your best bet.

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Yes, would be interesting to know, how QLib does this with its compiled "resident" extensions. Ralf -Original-Nachricht- Betreff: Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 Datum: 2017-04-11T10:47:36+0200 Von: "Jan Bredenbeek" On 11 April 2017 at 10:0

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

On 11 April 2017 at 10:07, Derek Stewart wrote: Hi Marcel, > > Do you think it is possible for the SMSQ/E internal compiler produce a > compiled version of the SBASIC programme? You can EXEC a SBASIC program in the same way as a 'normal' executable program on SMSQ/E (which

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

On 10/04/17 20:15, Marcel Kilgus wrote: Ralf Reköndt wrote: As this seems to be very near at QLib, it makes me wonder, if TT has any long lost source code of QLib. IIRC the QLib compiler was written in Basic. I don't think there are many similarities besides the basic concept. Marcel

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

With all those discussions about bug correction and the good, benevolent people who spend time to hunt them down, I wonder : Is there a proper way to report bugs in SMSQ/E ? Does asking kindly on this list enough ? :-) François ___ QL-Users Mailing

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Ralf Reköndt wrote: > As this seems to be very near at QLib, it makes me wonder, if TT has any > long lost source code of QLib. IIRC the QLib compiler was written in Basic. I don't think there are many similarities besides the basic concept. Marcel

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

As this seems to be very near at QLib, it makes me wonder, if TT has any long lost source code of QLib. Marcel Kilgus: Jan Bredenbeek wrote: I've been doing a lot of disassembling on the original QL ROM but understanding the SuperBASIC parser was a bridge too far for me, so I found it a very

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Jan Bredenbeek wrote: > I've been doing a lot of disassembling on the original QL ROM but > understanding the SuperBASIC parser was a bridge too far for me, so I found > it a very interesting read. It raises one question though - is SBASIC an > interpreter or a real-time compiler? It's a compiler

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Op 8/04/2017 om 10:15 schreef Wolf: Hi all, Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 is out now. Marcel has fixed the LRESPR bug. LRESPRing sbasic extensions in a procedure no longer crashes the machine. David Westbury also contributed valuable code: RPIXL now also works in 8 and 16 bit

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Hi Marcel, On 10 April 2017 at 00:28, Marcel Kilgus wrote: > Wolf wrote: > > Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 is out now. > > > > Marcel has fixed the LRESPR bug. LRESPRing sbasic extensions in a > > procedure no longer crashes the machine. > > Thank you Wolfgang.

Re: [Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Wolf wrote: > Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 is out now. > > Marcel has fixed the LRESPR bug. LRESPRing sbasic extensions in a > procedure no longer crashes the machine. Thank you Wolfgang. I have actually written down part of the journey in fixing this bug, so if this sort of technical

[Ql-Users] Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31

Hi all, Marcel has done it again - SMSQE 3.31 is out now. Marcel has fixed the LRESPR bug. LRESPRing sbasic extensions in a procedure no longer crashes the machine. David Westbury also contributed valuable code: RPIXL now also works in 8 and 16 bit modes. Finally, the string slicing