Thanks for all the kind messages, both on and off the list.
Being appreciated is always good and, although I am glad to hear you all
thought you got good service, I will cheerfully admit that my
accountancy skill are second to almost everything - now that does not
add up!
I kept it going
I have spent the last week deliberating about whether to write anything
here about the article in QL Today. In some ways I was very disinclined
to do it because I did not want it to turn in one of those acrimonious
arguments that run on these pages.
I would, however, like to run in a little
Thanks for the clarification, Roy. And sorry you had to make it.
Thanks for the service, subsidy and fun you have provided over the
years! I wish you better satisfaction with your other ventures.
Per
Roy wood wrote:
I have spent the last week deliberating about whether to write anything
In message zd2iqqeyz7zjf...@qbranch.demon.co.uk, Roy wood
qbra...@qbranch.demon.co.uk writes
Hi Roy,
I think that you did well to keep your QL interests going as long as you
did.
You were always a notable character at the many QL events that have been
held over the years.
I hope that you
P Witte wrote, On 30/03/09 16:30:
Roy wood wrote:
I have spent the last week deliberating about whether to write
anything here about the article in QL Today. In some ways I was very
disinclined to do it because I did not want it to turn in one of
those acrimonious arguments that run on
Evening Roy,
Roy wood wrote:
I have spent the last week deliberating about whether to write anything
here about the article in QL Today. In some ways I was very disinclined
to do it because I did not want it to turn in one of those acrimonious
arguments that run on these pages.
As I wrote in
