You are right...;-). That's a "lonely" bug...
Cheers...Ralf
- Original Message -
From: "Gerhard Plavec"
Often it's a real miracle when the written code does what the programmer
wanted... but may be that's onely a bug :)
___
QL-Users Mailin
Yo :)
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
The generally used name for this sort of miracle would be "bug" :))
Usually more code a programmer is generating, more "miracles" can be
discovered...
In very rare cases a "bug" can be used as a "feature
On 11 Oct 2009, at 22:30, Gerhard Plavec wrote:
Yo :)
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
The generally used name for this sort of miracle would be "bug" :))
Usually more code a programmer is generating, more "miracles" can be
discovered...
I
Yo :)
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can do
and what not.
The generally used name for this sort of miracle would be "bug" :))
Usually more code a programmer is generating, more "miracles" can be
discovered...
In very rare cases a "bug" can be used as a "feature"
On 10 Oct 2009, at 19:39, matras...@aol.com wrote:
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
Not a miracle. A writer of code will certainly usually know what it
does. But he may well not know ALL that it does. There is a fault in
SMSQ/E that can
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
No miracles from George's suggestion
-Original Message-
From: Marcel Kilgus
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 22:53
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QPC2 and direct sec
On 10 Oct 2009, at 13:52, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
That can happen, but the difference here is that the SMSQ/E side of
QPC lives in a virtual sandbox and no matter what you do with my 68k
code, you won't be able to extend the API available to it
(notwithstanding malicious attacks like stack and bu
gdgqler wrote:
>> ... then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
>> do and what not.
> I would have said the same until, a long time ago, I found someone
> using my code, usefully, for a purpose I had not imagined.
That can happen, but the difference here is that the SMSQ
On 9 Oct 2009, at 22:53, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
... then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
I would have said the same until, a long time ago, I found someone
using my code, usefully, for a purpose I had not imagined.
George
_
matras...@aol.com wrote:
> Yes he has, but I will try George's suggestion just in case, as it
> will only take a miniscule amount of time to try and if it delivers
... then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
> Its a pity that QPC2 does not support dire
29
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QPC2 and direct sector access
I think, Marcel has answered...it doesn't work.
Cheers...Ralf
- Original Message -
From: "gdgqler"
>> Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direc
t sector access
>> channel from S
I think, Marcel has answered...it doesn't work.
Cheers...Ralf
- Original Message -
From: "gdgqler"
Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direct sector access
channel from SBASIC to a non PC FAT formatted hard disk such as a
Q60 formatted compact flash card. I have tried to
On 8 Oct 2009, at 18:24, matras...@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direct sector access
channel from SBASIC to a non PC FAT formatted hard disk such as a
Q60 formatted compact flash card. I have tried to do this with
errt=FOP_DIR(#4,dos4_). While FOP_DIR retur
matras...@aol.com wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direct sector access
> channel from SBASIC to a non PC FAT formatted hard disk such as a
Nope, no way, sorry.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.ht
Hi,
Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direct sector access channel from
SBASIC to a non PC FAT formatted hard disk such as a Q60 formatted compact
flash card. I have tried to do this with errt=FOP_DIR(#4,dos4_). While FOP_DIR
returns 0 suggesting success the device as seen has a dime
15 matches
Mail list logo