Re: [Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected behaviour of the SBASIC cmd MRUN in a program...

2009-10-16 Thread GO BOY GO-LT
Martyn wrote - .. It's more than open to interpretation, but if you're still interested, let me explain (it's a bit long winded, but then I test software as part of my real job and get a bit fastidious about it). Write on Martyn, please.. And thanks. John in Wales

Re: [Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected behaviour of the SBASIC cmd MRUN in a program...

2009-10-15 Thread gdgqler
On 15 Oct 2009, at 00:13, Martyn Hill wrote: Take the following simple example (no MRUN involved here): Scenario A: LRESPR in the main program - OK. 10 LRESPR some_extn_file : REMark ** LRESPR some useful SB extentions 20 dummy_proc : REM ** Call a PROC that

Re: [Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected behaviour of the SBASIC cmd MRUN in a program...

2009-10-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
gdgqler wrote: I wonder if your program would also allow tptr_ext to be LRESPRd. If if so then there must be something special about what you are LRESPRing. If not then??? I did a quick test (using MENU_REXT) and actually even managed to crash SMSQ/E completely once. So there may be some

Re: [Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected behaviour of the SBASIC cmd MRUN in a program...

2009-10-14 Thread Martyn Hill
Hi Thanks to everyone who answered my initial post on this peculiar issue of MRUN not continuing to run the remaining program after merging some definitions. Firstly, I tried the simple cases suggested and yes, MRUN works just as expected. Secondly, line numbers of the merged definitions

Re: [Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected behaviour of the SBASIC cmd MRUN in a program...

2009-10-12 Thread gdgqler
On 11 Oct 2009, at 22:17, Martyn Hill wrote: Could anyone say whether the behaviour that I'm seeing when using MRUN in a running SBASIC prog is expected? As part of my initial SB boot prog, I include an MRUN statement that successfully merges some useful SB definitions (only). I expect

Re: [Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected behaviour of the SBASIC cmd MRUN in a program...

2009-10-12 Thread P Witte
Hi Martyn, Could your problem have to do with line numbers? Per Message Received: Oct 11 2009, 10:17 PM From: Martyn Hill martyn.joseph.h...@googlemail.com To: ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com Cc: Subject: [Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected

Re: [Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected behaviour of the SBASIC cmd MRUN in a program...

2009-10-12 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message 4ad24b63.5030...@googlemail.com, Martyn Hill martyn.joseph.h...@googlemail.com writes Hi Martyn. I know that LRUN works fine, in Boot links, as I use it successfully to chain a number of smaller Boot files; rather than one long one. As well as making choices to go to differing

[Ql-Users] Question regarding the expected behaviour of the SBASIC cmd MRUN in a program...

2009-10-11 Thread Martyn Hill
Hi again Could anyone say whether the behaviour that I'm seeing when using MRUN in a running SBASIC prog is expected? As part of my initial SB boot prog, I include an MRUN statement that successfully merges some useful SB definitions (only). I expect the boot prog to continue to execute