On 27 Oct 2009, at 09:45, Urs Koenig (QL) wrote:
If I need th software to go faster, then I re-programme in
Assembler and use a QL with a fast processor.
Good one. ;-)
I'm still writing my stuff in SuperBASIC under QPC2/Q-emuLator
on a Core2Duo (L7500/1.6Ghz) Notebook
I write perhaps half i
> Sorry to cause problems, but it is only what I read.
No problem. I just wanted to be sure if running speed is
the same no matter if compiled with C68 or XTC68.
> If I need th software to go faster, then I re-programme in
> Assembler and use a QL with a fast processor.
Good one. ;-)
I'm still wr
Hi Urs,
Sorry to cause problems, but it is only what I read.
If I need th software to go faster, then I re-programme in Assembler and
use a QL with a fast processor.
Derek
Urs Koenig (QL) wrote:
UKQ> 1. Are the binaries 1:1 (file compare)?
1. Yes - except you have to recreate the QDOS file
> > UKQ> 1. Are the binaries 1:1 (file compare)?
> > 1. Yes - except you have to recreate the QDOS file header
> > (file type and dataspace) once you get the file onto a QDOS
> > volume.
> If I remember right, there can be a 30% increase in speed.
If the compiled binaries are 100% identical this w
If I remember right, there can be a 30% increase in speed.
I am not sure if this is correct, but I am sure that Prowess running
faster when compiled with XTC68.
Derek
Adrian D. Ives wrote:
Urs,
As you said, to the QL community it means "Just" that one can compile
QDOS-programs under Windows
Urs,
As you said, to the QL community it means "Just" that one can compile
QDOS-programs under Windows. This is useful, however, for those only
running emulators, because it means compilation can happen at the full
speed of the native OS' CPU, rather than the (admittedly very
efficient) emulated
> Just to close off my original request, I have now
> successfully recompiled C68 (as XTC68) under Open Watcom C
> Version 1.8 and MinGW (Minimalist GNU for Windows) GCC 3.4.5.
> The latter version is useful because it integrates very well
> with the MinGW environment and allows MinGW Make to b
Adrian D. Ives writes:
<>
ToolWatcom Name MinGW Name
~~~ ~~
Assembler as68qas
Compilerc68 qc
Front End qcc qcc
Linker qld qld
Pre-Processor qcppqpp
Make
Dave,
I'm very happy to do that. I think it makes a lot of sense for this to
be hosted with the rest of C68. I'll zip the current stuff up and send
it over to you.
I've tried to retain the "multi-platform compatibility" of the
original by continuing to use compile time defines to select the
appro
...@lists.q-v-d.com
[mailto:ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] On Behalf Of Adrian D. Ives
Sent: 25 October 2009 08:10
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] XTC68 Status Report
Just to close off my original request, I have now successfully recompiled
C68 (as XTC68) under Open Watcom C Version 1.8 and
Hi Adian,
Looks like you have done a fantastic job with XTC68, I would be
interested in having a look.
Have you got a web site that files are made available.
Derek
Adrian D. Ives wrote:
Just to close off my original request, I have now successfully
recompiled C68 (as XTC68) under Open Watco
Just to close off my original request, I have now successfully
recompiled C68 (as XTC68) under Open Watcom C Version 1.8 and MinGW
(Minimalist GNU for Windows) GCC 3.4.5. The latter version is useful
because it integrates very well with the MinGW environment and allows
MinGW Make to be used to bui
12 matches
Mail list logo