On 11 Oct 2009, at 22:30, Gerhard Plavec wrote:
Yo :)
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
The generally used name for this sort of miracle would be bug :))
Usually more code a programmer is generating, more miracles can be
discovered...
In
Yo :)
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
The generally used name for this sort of miracle would be bug :))
Usually more code a programmer is generating, more miracles can be
discovered...
In very rare cases a bug can be used as a feature -
You are right...;-). That's a lonely bug...
Cheers...Ralf
- Original Message -
From: Gerhard Plavec
Often it's a real miracle when the written code does what the programmer
wanted... but may be that's onely a bug :)
___
QL-Users Mailing
On 10 Oct 2009, at 19:39, matras...@aol.com wrote:
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
Not a miracle. A writer of code will certainly usually know what it
does. But he may well not know ALL that it does. There is a fault in
SMSQ/E that
Yo :)
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can do
and what not.
The generally used name for this sort of miracle would be bug :))
Usually more code a programmer is generating, more miracles can be
discovered...
In very rare cases a bug can be used as a feature - that
gdgqler wrote:
... then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
I would have said the same until, a long time ago, I found someone
using my code, usefully, for a purpose I had not imagined.
That can happen, but the difference here is that the SMSQ/E
On 10 Oct 2009, at 13:52, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
That can happen, but the difference here is that the SMSQ/E side of
QPC lives in a virtual sandbox and no matter what you do with my 68k
code, you won't be able to extend the API available to it
(notwithstanding malicious attacks like stack and
then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
No miracles from George's suggestion
-Original Message-
From: Marcel Kilgus ql-us...@mail.kilgus.net
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 22:53
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QPC2
On 8 Oct 2009, at 18:24, matras...@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direct sector access
channel from SBASIC to a non PC FAT formatted hard disk such as a
Q60 formatted compact flash card. I have tried to do this with
errt=FOP_DIR(#4,dos4_). While FOP_DIR
I think, Marcel has answered...it doesn't work.
Cheers...Ralf
- Original Message -
From: gdgqler
Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direct sector access
channel from SBASIC to a non PC FAT formatted hard disk such as a
Q60 formatted compact flash card. I have tried to
2009 17:29
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QPC2 and direct sector access
I think, Marcel has answered...it doesn't work.
Cheers...Ralf
- Original Message -
From: gdgqler
Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direc
t sector access
channel from SBASIC to a non PC FAT
matras...@aol.com wrote:
Yes he has, but I will try George's suggestion just in case, as it
will only take a miniscule amount of time to try and if it delivers
... then it's some sort of miracle. Usually I do know what my code can
do and what not.
Its a pity that QPC2 does not support direct
matras...@aol.com wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a way to open a direct sector access
channel from SBASIC to a non PC FAT formatted hard disk such as a
Nope, no way, sorry.
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
13 matches
Mail list logo
