Re: [Ql-Users] More BASIC Queries

2009-11-15 Thread gdgqler
On 14 Nov 2009, at 16:04, P Witte wrote: The way the question was formulated, a line by line stepping through a program - specifically, a boot script - was wanted. This hardly adds to the responses already given, although its fine if only a few lines want monitoring. You can use QMON to

Re: [Ql-Users] Web Emulator

2009-11-15 Thread Tony Firshman
Rich Mellor wrote, On 15/11/09 09:15: Gerhard Plavec wrote: Has anyone looked at producing a version of a QL emulator in Java - with the popularity of the QL Wiki continually increasing, it is good to see it getting high ratings on google when searching for programs. It is also helping to

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ Reference Manual and QPTR manual online

2009-11-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
gdgqler wrote: $23 is qa.tan2 Only in SMSQ/E, but not Minerva $25 and $27 are not there They're available in Minerva, but not SMSQ/E $2F increases the stack by 4, not 2 $2F is Minerva only and as I see it, it does increase by 2 $32 returns PI SMSQ/E only again. With all the different

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ Reference Manual and QPTR manual online

2009-11-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
gdgqler wrote: However (isn't there quite often a however?) there are one or two pencilled amendments in my printed manuals which someone may like to confirm or refute. By the way, this is all in Text87 which is a program I can only use with great difficulty. If somebody else of course wants

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ Reference Manual and QPTR manual online

2009-11-15 Thread Ralf Reköndt
From: Marcel Kilgus By the way, this is all in Text87 which is a program I can only use with great difficulty. If somebody else of course wants to maintin the manuals... ;-) Any chance to get the original QPTR text? Cheers...Ralf ___ QL-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ Reference Manual and QPTR manual online

2009-11-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Ralf Reköndt wrote: From: Marcel Kilgus By the way, this is all in Text87 which is a program I can only use with great difficulty. If somebody else of course wants to maintin the manuals... ;-) Any chance to get the original QPTR text? What is that? Marcel

Re: [Ql-Users] Web Emulator

2009-11-15 Thread Rich Mellor
Tony Firshman wrote: Rich Mellor wrote, On 15/11/09 09:15: Gerhard Plavec wrote: Has anyone looked at producing a version of a QL emulator in Java - with the popularity of the QL Wiki continually increasing, it is good to see it getting high ratings on google when searching for programs.

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ Reference Manual and QPTR manual online

2009-11-15 Thread Ralf Reköndt
The original QJump docs have embedded control codes (like \j, \b or \mn codes für l+r justifying, bold text and monospaced text.). They were printed with QPLQ (an inhouse QJump program) nearly as the way TeX prints. Far bejond text87. So, if someone can supply the original text, I can print it

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ Reference Manual and QPTR manual online

2009-11-15 Thread P Witte
Marcel Kilgus wrote: With all the different OS and release versions it's difficult to keep everything in sync. As you say. I too have a number of corrections, but no longer know whether they apply or not, as there were so many intermediate versions. Thus sms.sevt (trap #1, $3a) A0+ all

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ Reference Manual and QPTR manual online

2009-11-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
P Witte wrote: iob.elin (trap#3, $4) was a terrible mess. I wrote to TT about it and he agreed, but I dont know it was ever fixed No idea either. 1. Page 60 In IOP.RPXL it seems that A1 is not preserved. This was fixed in later PE releases and SMSQ/E. Last time I checked iop.rpxl wasnt

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQ Reference Manual and QPTR manual online

2009-11-15 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Ralf Reköndt wrote: The original QJump docs have embedded control codes (like \j, \b or \mn codes für l+r justifying, bold text and monospaced text.). Ah, okay. No, can't help you there, sorry. Don't even have the QPTR sources. Marcel ___ QL-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] More BASIC Queries

2009-11-15 Thread P Witte
giggler wrote: On 14 Nov 2009, at 16:04, P Witte wrote: The way the question was formulated, a line by line stepping through a program - specifically, a boot script - was wanted. This hardly adds to the responses already given, although its fine if only a few lines want monitoring. You