Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-05 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message b10445d8807f407c95cb6b6b8f2b1...@donna, Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk writes I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98 machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time. I think this is the point - without help it can't be got running if you

Re: [Ql-Users] JMS is 25!!

2009-05-05 Thread Jochen Merz
Hi Malcolm, yes - a long time, indeed. We will report the feedback about the changes in the next issue. Cheers Jochen Malcolm Cadman wrote: In message 49fd65af.1060...@j-m-s.com, SMSQ s...@j-m-s.com writes Hi Jochen, Interesting that it has been so long now. Well done to you, and

Re: [Ql-Users] JMS is 25!!

2009-05-05 Thread Jochen Merz
Thank you :-) François Van Emelen wrote: SMSQ schreef: Hi everybody, just wanted to announce that J-M-S was founded 25 years ago (2nd of May 1984) and has survived for 25 years now!! SNIP All the best, Jochen Congratulations! François Van Emelen

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-05 Thread P Witte
Id be interested in such a package. Had a go with Cygwin/uQLx some time ago but had only limited success. Getting rid of the debris was a pain, iirc. Per Dilwyn Jones wrote: I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98 machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time.

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-05 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
Malcolm Cadman wrote: The problem is that making a runtime version of cygwin is not entirely straightforward as it used to be in the old days :-( I am sure that If I sat down, I could probably find the way, but to be honest with you I didn't have enough time as it were and didn't want to mess