The idea of a QL in a CPLD is nice.
Hi Peter,Could you get into detail regarding the QL in a CPLD? I'm keen to know
more about possible future Hardware development for the QL. I would love to
have a replacement board for the original QL case which has a timeless
wonderfull design. Having a
Hi Thorsten,
[...]
I'm keen to know more about possible future Hardware development
for the QL.
[...]
Very nice that you still have interest in major QL hardware. However, I
have already spent more time on discussions than I probably should. Major
QL hardware is practically impossible as
Major QL hardware is practically impossible as long as the QL operating system
situation remains as it has been for almost a decade. The only reasonable
way out seems to be a restructured Minerva with new drivers. Work on it
continues slowly.
I'm not aware of that information. Who is the
thorsten herbert wrote, on 26/Jan/11 16:01 | Jan26:
Major QL hardware is practically impossible as long as the QL operating system
situation remains as it has been for almost a decade. The only reasonable
way out seems to be a restructured Minerva with new drivers. Work on it
continues slowly.
I think what is needed is a manufacturer license that can be extended to
people who are developing hardware and who need a close level of integration
between the OS and hardware. The license should have a simple per unit fee,
and the manufacturer should be responsible for supporting the OS on that
