On 08/12/2011 07:53, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
This proved to be a harder nut to crack than I thought. All my efforts
so
far have yielded similar results. I don't have Open Office installed,
but
whatever I do with M$ Works causes the same scrambled layout.
I'm wondering if it is the docx
En/Je/On 2011-12-07 10:48, Daniele Terdina escribió / skribis / wrote :
You can use SMSQ/E with Q-emuLator,
I know, but you have to purchase it (the Gold Card version). Am I right?
That's what I meant. Thanks to the QLPAK format, currently Q-emuLator is more
suitable than QPC2 for distributing
If the License is too restrictive and doesn't carry with today's fast paced
information age, then what is there stopping people to go back to the
current license holder and ask it it could be changed?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Marcos Cruz q...@programandala.net wrote:
En/Je/On 2011-12-07
Where's the like button :-) . I really can't believe we are still stuck
with this out of date ridiculous licence that's killing any chance of a
future for SMSQ/E. Surely it can be renegotiated?
On 08/12/2011 13:19, Marcos Cruz wrote:
En/Je/On 2011-12-07 10:48, Daniele Terdina escribió /
On 08/12/2011 16:43, Malcolm Lear wrote:
Where's the like button :-) . I really can't believe we are still
stuck with this out of date ridiculous licence that's killing any
chance of a future for SMSQ/E. Surely it can be renegotiated?
On 08/12/2011 13:19, Marcos Cruz wrote:
En/Je/On
Dilwyn, on your original message about the calendar you said that the
.docx file would be 10M; however the 2011 one on your website is 1.3M.
This 2011 one loaded into OO perfectly, with the pictures at the top. The
2012 pdf has pictures at the bottom. Your good intentions have put you to
all
