Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator

2013-01-31 Thread Urs Koenig (QL)
Wolfgang wrote: coffee), Qmachine (for quick machine, a ready to go environment for quick developments/tinkering), Qanywhere, Qware or the same four with SMSQ (SMSQup, SMSQmachine, SMSQanywhere, SMSQware). Or what about just Q (related to Q of the James Bond movies), Que or Q4U? Anyone?

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator

2013-01-31 Thread Urs Koenig (QL)
Wolfgang wrote: I must say that I've banned Java from my own PCs for ages but thanks to SMSQmulator I've installed Java 6 on my workhorse (a 2007 Lenovo X61s with dual core Intel Core2Duo L7500 1600Mhz CPU running under Windows Vista Business 32-bit). Any reason you didn't install java 7?

[Ql-Users] SMSQmulator

2013-01-31 Thread Bryan Horstmann
Hello all, I've got this running now. Great potential for me. I made a folder in Program Files but it wouldn't install in there. I tried putting it elsewhere and it ran all right. I then copied the fileset to the folder which I had prepared but it wouldn't run. I am reliably toldthat this

[Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Stumbled across something seemingly useful for 68K assembler developers, not sure if it’s been mentioned before but here goes. It’s something called Easy68K, an editor, assembler and simulator for the 68000 (integrated development environment), running on Windows. (OK Norman, I know...) The

Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 31/01/13 14:39, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Stumbled across something seemingly useful for 68K assembler developers, not sure if it’s been mentioned before but here goes. It’s something called Easy68K, an editor, assembler and simulator for the 68000 (integrated development environment), running

Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Windows isn't all bad you know Dilwyn, I quite like Windows 7 to be honest. He he, I just expected a comment from you, that's all! I'm much more comfortable with Windows these days, especially since starting to use Windoze 7. I can't believe how stable this PC is running Win7 and QPC2 as my

Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Tony Firshman
Norman Dunbar wrote, on 31/Jan/13 14:47 | Jan31: On 31/01/13 14:39, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Stumbled across something seemingly useful for 68K assembler developers, not sure if it’s been mentioned before but here goes. It’s something called Easy68K, an editor, assembler and simulator for the 68000

Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Ian Burkinshaw
Hi Dilwyn New one on me, but that is not difficult. Just downloaded it, very interesting. Also very small download at 2.44MB. Must admit I have always kept away from machine code. But this looks like a very good way to start learning. The simulator is very good, since you can step line by

Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 31/01/13 16:51, Ian Burkinshaw wrote: Must admit I have always kept away from machine code. Hmmm. Do my QL Today articles on the matter, since many many years ago, not inspire you? :-( Cheers, Norm. -- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd Registered address: Thorpe House 61

Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 31/01/13 14:47, Norman Dunbar wrote: I also note that the source code is available - so it should/could/might be possible to compile it to run natively under Linux or Mac, if it will work under wxWidgets or Qt. (And no, I don't have time, thanks!) Couldn't resist it could I? I had a look

Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Ian Burkinshaw
Hi Norman I do read them. But up until recently I have not had the time, to get down and learn it all. Some of it I do not fully understand. But if I started to learn it properly, I am sure it would make much more sense. The way Easy68K, displays things does make it more understandable, at

Re: [Ql-Users] Easy68K

2013-01-31 Thread Derek Stewart
On 31/01/13 18:50, Norman Dunbar wrote: On 31/01/13 17:31, Ian Burkinshaw wrote: For example I have never realy understood which registers are used for what. They can be used for anything. However, calling QDOSMSQ routines via vectors or traps does mean that you have to have certain things in

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator

2013-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
Hi Urs, I did not want to be or sound offending in any way or quip as you say. Look, no problem at all. I just wanted to give this some levity (by, ahem, Quipping). I just wanted to express my very personal opinion that I find the product's name not as great as the product itself -

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator

2013-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
Hi Bryan, * When I select Xchange, I cannot find out how to bring it up to screen size; I've already set the screen size correctly Simple : you can't Xhange has a fiwed screen size which you can't change (unless you poke around somewhere in the program's code, I think). * I cannot