Re: [Ql-Users] the british way
Anonymous FTP doesn’t gather user information or store cookies etc so it should be exempt. If it’s not then millions of domains in the uk are in deep trouble. Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Jun 2022, at 12:17, pjwitte via Ql-Users > wrote: > > On 21/06/2022 10:53, Caroline Mathieson via Ql-Users wrote: >> Maybe time to bring back the good old BBS >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>>> On 17 Jun 2022, at 18:27, desin via Ql-Users >>>> wrote: >>> >>> https://webdevlaw.uk/2022/06/17/data-reform-bill-cookie-popups/ > > Dialup? Modems? Im not sure Im up for that. The alternative is to access the > BBS via Internet. But then, wouldnt the same laws apply? > > Per > ___ > QL-Users Mailing List ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] the british way
Maybe time to bring back the good old BBS Sent from my iPhone > On 17 Jun 2022, at 18:27, desin via Ql-Users wrote: > > https://webdevlaw.uk/2022/06/17/data-reform-bill-cookie-popups/ > ___ > QL-Users Mailing List ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] CSME : Track
Don’t forget there are women in this group! Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Apr 2021, at 08:36, Christopher Cave via Ql-Users > wrote: > > Gentlemen > Should we propose to sell the track it might be a good idea to see what > we have sitting on the trailer. The track, supports and carriage have > been sitting under a heavy plastic cover for some years. I suggest we use > a Tuesday pm to get the stuff out and check it out - we could of course > set up some of the track in the back garden and even run a loco (POP ?) > on it! > > Christopher > > > ___ > QL-Users Mailing List ___ QL-Users Mailing List
