Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
Thanks :) On 16/12/2017 19:36, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: The least significant of the 6 green bits. Am 16.12.2017 um 19:12 schrieb pjwitte via Ql-Users: Sorry for yanking your chain again so soon but, on going the other way, ie from mode 32 to 33, what is the best value for W? g6, 0, 1..?

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
The least significant of the 6 green bits. Am 16.12.2017 um 19:12 schrieb pjwitte via Ql-Users: > Sorry for yanking your chain again so soon but, on going the other > way, ie from mode 32 to 33, what is the best value for W? g6, 0, 1..? > > Per > > On 16/12/2017 18:13, pjwitte via Ql-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
Sorry for yanking your chain again so soon but, on going the other way, ie from mode 32 to 33, what is the best value for W? g6, 0, 1..? Per On 16/12/2017 18:13, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: Aah! Perfect! Thanks Marcel, youre a star! So in fact I interpreted the input wrong. It should have

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
Aah! Perfect! Thanks Marcel, youre a star! So in fact I interpreted the input wrong. It should have been: GGGggRRR rrBBBbbW <- input and ggWBBBbb RRRrrGGG -> output Seems so obvious now ;) Per On 16/12/2017 15:30, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote: 320 c$ = c$(4 to 5) & c$(16) & c$(11 to

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: > With > > 290  REMark GGGBBBbb RRRrrgg0 > 300  c$ = c$(3 TO 5) & c$(11 TO 15) & c$(6 TO 10) & c$(1 TO 2) & '0' > > I got the best results. While, with 300 REMarked out and 320 un-REMarked: > > 310  ggWBBBbb RRRrrGGG -> RRRrrGGG ggWBBBbb in big-endian > 320  c$ = c$(1

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
Thanks both for your input! However, Wolfgang, Im having trouble with your suggestion. Perhaps Ive interpreted wrongly? Heres how I got on: 100 REMark Convert screens mode 33 to 32 110 REMark POC, pjw, December 16th 2017 120 : 140 fnm$ = 'ram2_dmp1024x768_scr' 150 : 160 t = DATE 170 ERT

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: > I havent tested your suggestion yet, Wolfgang, but what I found so far > was that gggbrgg0 appears (to my eye) to look cleaner than > gggbrggW. Is that so wrong? ;) It is right, because gggbrggW has the W at the wrong bit. It must be the

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
Oops! That should be: GGGBBBbb RRRrrgg0 = mode 32 translated P On 16/12/2017 11:43, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: I havent tested your suggestion yet, Wolfgang, but what I found so far was that gggbrgg0 appears (to my eye) to look cleaner than gggbrggW. Is that so wrong? ;) BTW,

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread Wolf via Ql-Users
Hi Per, The PC switches the bytes around. So gggb rgg0 actually means rgg0 gggb In other words, you're switching the third highest byte for green on or off. If you sure that's what you want, then that's fine. Wolfgang On 16/12/2017 11:43, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: I

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
But the same as my proposal :) Wolf via Ql-Users wrote: > No, not the same as %gggbrggW, as suggested in the original post. > > Wolfgang > > On 16/12/2017 10:18, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: >> Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote: >>> I'd do it this way >>> >>> %ggWbrggg >> >>

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread Wolf via Ql-Users
No, not the same as %gggbrggW, as suggested in the original post. Wolfgang On 16/12/2017 10:18, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote: I'd do it this way %ggWbrggg Which is the same :) ___ QL-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-16 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users wrote: > I'd do it this way > > %ggWbrggg Which is the same :) ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-15 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
I'd do it this way %ggWbrggg Regards Wolfgang On 15/12/2017 18:51, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: I want to convert a mode 33 screen (Qxx) to mode 32 (QPC2) and visa versa. I got this far with 33 to 32, but Im not sure this is the best translation: rem %grbw = mode 33

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-15 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
Thanks guys :) On 16/12/2017 00:30, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: What do I do with 'w' in either case for best results? I would just use the RGB0 bit of mode 33 as G0 Bit of mode 32, which is what you probably do already. There is no perfect translation, since mode 33 has 64 clean grey

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-15 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
> What do I do with 'w' in either case for best results? I would just use the RGB0 bit of mode 33 as G0 Bit of mode 32, which is what you probably do already. There is no perfect translation, since mode 33 has 64 clean grey levels, while mode 32 has only 32. There will be a minimal green tint in

Re: [Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-15 Thread Dave Park via Ql-Users
33->32 the W would be the least significant bit of G, and that bit would be a copy of the most significant bit of G such that a full black pixel will be full black and a full green pixel will be full green so white can be white and not have a magenta tinge. This would cause a likely imperceptible

[Ql-Users] Mode 33 to 32

2017-12-15 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
I want to convert a mode 33 screen (Qxx) to mode 32 (QPC2) and visa versa. I got this far with 33 to 32, but Im not sure this is the best translation: rem %grbw = mode 33 rem %gggbrggg = mode 32 c$ = BIN$(PEEK_W(a), 16) c$ = c$(3 TO 5) & c$(11 TO 15) & c$(6 TO 10) & c$(1