Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-30 Thread Fabrizio Diversi via Ql-Users
Thank you Marcel! Really good news. I am using QL-SD adapter since quite a lot of time and it is definitively an important upgrade for the BBQL I am not sure if I understood well and you will produce some units by yourself, In case yes I will be delighted to have one board (may be 2

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote: > This is amazing work! Thanks. > It also means I can stop my occasional work on my QL-SD version. I have no > desire to sell a QL-SD into a crowded marketplace. > > Instead, I'd like to buy one for compatibility testing on Issue 8. We can certainly arrange

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: >> As far as I could gather in my limited tests, INGOT 5 never worked >> (which includes the Tetroid) and INGOT 6 worked or at least mostly >> worked. > That makes me a little sceptic, because I have one labelled "INGOT 5" > which worked (with the original driver and

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
Am 30.03.2018 um 00:47 schrieb Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: > Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: >> Did you test your logic changes with a non-Tetroid GC inside a QL where >> the original logic did *not* work reliably? >> >> I'm asking, because IIRC you reported total failure of the original >> logic

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: > Did you test your logic changes with a non-Tetroid GC inside a QL where > the original logic did *not* work reliably? > > I'm asking, because IIRC you reported total failure of the original > logic with the Tetroid GC, while my experience was, that non-Tetroid GC >

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
Am 29.03.2018 um 23:29 schrieb Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users: > Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have > made huge progress regarding my work on QL-SD that I was going to > write about today anyway: > > https://www.kilgus.net/2018/03/29/ql-sd-news/ Must have been a

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Giorgio Garabello via Ql-Users
Awesome!You are the best! 2018-03-29 23:43 GMT+02:00 Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>: > > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, at 10:42 PM, Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote: > > A Lattice JTAG programmer is all. > > > I have a couple of FTDI JTAG doodats, but no specific Lattice one. > >

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, at 10:42 PM, Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote: > A Lattice JTAG programmer is all. > I have a couple of FTDI JTAG doodats, but no specific Lattice one. Graeme ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Dave Park via Ql-Users
A Lattice JTAG programmer is all. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, at 10:29 PM, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote: > > Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have > > made huge

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users
On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, at 10:29 PM, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote: > Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have > made huge progress regarding my work on QL-SD that I was going to > write about today anyway: > > https://www.kilgus.net/2018/03/29/ql-sd-news/ > >

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Dave Park via Ql-Users
This is amazing work! It also means I can stop my occasional work on my QL-SD version. I have no desire to sell a QL-SD into a crowded marketplace. Instead, I'd like to buy one for compatibility testing on Issue 8. This lets me focus on other projects that I have been neglecting this last

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread RWAP Software via Ql-Users
That is great news Marcel :) Rich Mellor RWAP Software www.rwapsoftware.co.uk www.sellmyretro.com On 2018-03-29 22:29, Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users wrote: Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have made huge progress regarding my work on QL-SD that I was going to

[Ql-Users] QL-SD news

2018-03-29 Thread Marcel Kilgus via Ql-Users
Speaking of only announcing stuff that basically already works, I have made huge progress regarding my work on QL-SD that I was going to write about today anyway: https://www.kilgus.net/2018/03/29/ql-sd-news/ Hope this is interesting to you all. Cheers, Marcel

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News

2013-12-05 Thread Kenn Van Hauen
would be interested in 2/3 QL-SD units. Ian Burkinshaw - Original Message - From: Peter Graf pg...@q40.de To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:56 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News Francois Lanciault wrote: Looking forward to an official news

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News

2013-12-05 Thread Peter
Hi, thanks, Kenn, Lee, Ian. From my side, QL-SD was purely a charity project. I'm not involved in any commercial aspects. So except from seeing that the work of Adrian and me is useful for a few QLers, it won't change much if I read this here. If you like, maybe one of you can collect emails

[Ql-Users] QL-SD News

2013-12-04 Thread Peter
Hi, the restriction that a QL memory expansion is madatory for QL-SD has been removed. If a QL-SD filesystem of 3 MB size (and Groupsize 8) is attached, there still remains 62.5 KB free memory on an unexpanded QL. Not very much, but enough to load TK2 and still be able do useful things. This

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News

2013-12-04 Thread Dave Park
Cool! Excellent work! Dave On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Peter pg...@q40.de wrote: Hi, the restriction that a QL memory expansion is madatory for QL-SD has been removed. If a QL-SD filesystem of 3 MB size (and Groupsize 8) is attached, there still remains 62.5 KB free memory on an

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News

2013-12-04 Thread Lee Privett
Totally agree, excellent work and exciting to say the least. On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Dave Park d...@sinclairql.com wrote: Cool! Excellent work! Dave On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Peter pg...@q40.de wrote: Hi, the restriction that a QL memory expansion is madatory for

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News

2013-12-04 Thread Francois Lanciault
Looking forward to an official news with price and availability. François De: Lee Privett Envoyé: mercredi 4 décembre 2013 10:50 À: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Répondre à: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Objet: Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News Totally agree, excellent work and exciting to say the least. On Wed, Dec 4

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News

2013-12-04 Thread Ian Burkinshaw
Hi Peter If it helps in gaining a measure outside Germany, I would be interested in 2/3 QL-SD units. Ian Burkinshaw - Original Message - From: Peter Graf pg...@q40.de To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:56 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News Francois

Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News

2013-12-04 Thread Francois Lanciault
Two third of a unit !! :-) De: Ian Burkinshaw Envoyé: mercredi 4 décembre 2013 17:02 À: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Répondre à: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Objet: Re: [Ql-Users] QL-SD News Hi Peter If it helps in gaining a measure outside Germany, I would be interested in 2/3 QL-SD units. Ian Burkinshaw