Re: [Ql-Users] toolkit-ii-the-sequel and CDEC$
Ah, that reminds me of writing bugs to TT, but that was only possible with letters to King Street, Rampton, so took a bit longer than today. Keep up the good work! - Original Message - From: "Marcel Kilgus" Michael Bulford wrote: There seems to be a problem with CDEC$. CDEC$(123,4,0) should give " 123", but gives instead 4 asterisks. Confirmed, that one is on me. I will hold back with the update a bit in case you find some more ;-) Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] toolkit-ii-the-sequel and CDEC$
Michael Bulford wrote: > There seems to be a problem with CDEC$. > CDEC$(123,4,0) should give " 123", but gives instead 4 asterisks. Confirmed, that one is on me. I will hold back with the update a bit in case you find some more ;-) Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List
Re: [Ql-Users] toolkit-ii-the-sequel and CDEC$
There seems to be a problem with CDEC$. CDEC$(123,4,0) should give " 123", but gives instead 4 asterisks. Michael ___ QL-Users Mailing List