Richard Zidlicky writes:
Also very nice source of desaster are div and mod routines wrt
negative
values and overflow. Those are often used in direct disk access
programs.
viz:
DIV/MOD
SMSQ/E and Minerva say:
7 div 3 , 7 mod 3 = 2 , 1
-7 div 3 , -7 mod 3 = -3 , 2
7 div -3 , 7
At 01:00 ðì 18/5/2001 -0400, you wrote:
Informed sources tell me (I feel like being mysterious at this hour :-) )
that there are a couple of 68EC060's about to appear on Ebay for around $25
plus shipping, look for them under electronic parts within 12 hours or
so...
Nasta
Other informed sources
I have a strange question about float number:
what are the maximal and minimal values for a float, on the QL.
I have found the answer for Abacus (it's in the doc!), but
not for the SBasic/whole system.
Il me semble qu'à l'origine la pub parlait 10^512 et 10^-512 ou quelque
chose comme ça (qui n'a guère de sens avec seulement 7 chiffres
significatifs)
-Message d'origine-
De : Jerome Grimbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : vendredi 18 mai 2001 10:17
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet :
-Original Message-
From: Claude Mourier 00 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Il me semble qu'à l'origine la pub parlait 10^512 et 10^-512 ou quelque
chose comme ça (qui n'a guère de sens avec seulement 7 chiffres
significatifs)
That's easy for you to say :o)
I thought it was about 10^604
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
I have a strange question about float number:
what are the maximal and minimal values for a float, on the QL.
That should be from 1E-620 to 1.615850285E616.
Marcel
The M68000 Family Programmer's Reference Manual (which covers the
68040) states the range of a double precision real as 2.2 x 10^-308 to
1.8 x 10^308. It is an eight byte format as shown:
63 6252 51 0
--
|s|exponent|fraction| (They use 'fraction' instead of
The M68000 Family Programmer's Reference Manual (which covers the
68040) states the range of a double precision real as 2.2 x 10^-308 to
1.8 x 10^308. It is an eight byte format as shown:
This has nothing to do the with QL FP format. The format QDOS uses is
not IEEE compatible.
IIRC the
On 5/18/01 at 11:43 AM Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Informed sources tell me (I feel like being mysterious at this hour :-) )
that there are a couple of 68EC060's about to appear on Ebay for around
$25 plus shipping, look for them under electronic parts within 12 hours or
so...
It was one and now its
At 01:58 ìì 18/5/2001 -0400, you wrote:
On 5/18/01 at 11:43 AM Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Informed sources tell me (I feel like being mysterious at this hour :-) )
that there are a couple of 68EC060's about to appear on Ebay for around
$25 plus shipping, look for them under electronic parts within
On 17 May 2001, at 13:31, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
the problem is a bit more than simply QPC x86 code against m68k.
SMSQ is written in 68000 assembly and even rewriting it to make
use of 68020-60 arithmetic would be a major task, not to mention
the lack of suitable assembler for it.
So a
At 02:19 ìì 18/5/2001 -0400, you wrote:
On 5/18/01 at 2:02 PM Phoebus Dokos wrote:
there are a couple of 68EC060's about to appear on Ebay for around
$25 plus shipping, look for them under electronic parts within 12 hours
It was one and now its gone :-)
I meant in addition to THAT one!
Using school maths I get:
7 div 3 , 7 mod 3 = 2 , 1
-7 div 3 , -7 mod 3 = -2 , -1
7 div -3 , 7 mod -3 = -2 , 1
-7 div -3 , -7 mod -3 = 2 , -1
Don't forget that under Modulo 3, the numbers -1 and 2 are equivalent.
Nasta wrote:
there are a couple of 68EC060's about to appear on Ebay for around
$25 plus shipping, look for them under electronic parts within 12 hours
Thanks for trying to help. Unfortunately the EC version is too crippled to
run SMSQ/E or Linux.
Phoebus wrote:
well do your sources tell
14 matches
Mail list logo