On Sat, 6 Apr 2002 at 20:13:10, Geoff Wicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: P Witte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] DIANOUX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally, those who moan
about Lookout Express should consider how they would feel
about changing their
Is it only me, or does everyone have problems getting Qmon to trace throught an IOW.XTOP call ?? Qmon just simply crashes, even if it is set to trace supervisor mode.
Does anyone have a solution??
Jmon also seems to crash QPC.
Rich Mellor
RWAP Software
7 Common Road, Kinsley, Pontefract, West
In article 3X6Z6PNNJ6ZMJPL07DCWVMURIF1XB8.3cae130a@quantum-central,
Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
5/4/2002 4:05:54 ??, / Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Well i am not using the
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Qmail
Exists... Ask J. Dent for more :-)
Well, mine'll probably be called Qemail (pronounced keymail) to match the
Qeyboard (pronounced, well, you know ;)
Nice idea of 'namimg' :-) ...
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geoff Wicks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Many thanks, Per, you have expressed my feelings exactly not only in the
above quote but in your whole piece. In about two years I have only caught a
virus once and that was my own fault! (I caught it from a QL-user on this
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Qmail
Hmmm, I do have to do something there. I've written an email client
before. If I do something, it will end up looking like pine.
Qbrowser
Even the most basic browser is a huge undertaking. This would have to be a
group
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 at 13:48:22, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:13:10PM +0100, Geoff Wicks wrote:
It may be surprising
for some but the QL actually had working email/news programs for
maus and fido -nets long before MS - and at that time
Ummm on second thought we should write a QubIDE partition eraser
(Wait it does that on its own!) Damn! you can't even write a
decent virus for the QL nowadays :-)
(Now THAT IS ON TOPIC)
Err, it has been done. Ask Geoff Wicks (he wasn't the author of it,
BTW, before he gets the blame)
--
Dilwyn
Tarquin has already started to write a browser in beta form for the
QL -
he is also a RISC OS user - I have forgotten what he calls it.
Hyperbrowser
I have a copy, yet it doesn't work for me :-(
... anyone got it working ?
Yes, all but one version I could only get to work with text. He has
(or
Thanks again to those who replied to my mail on this subject. I have
passed on the offers of testing help received from you to Simon
Goodwin.
One thing he mentioned is that it would help to get exact details of
your hardware from those who replied (Per, Davide, Peter, Fabrizio). I
suggest you
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Nice idea of 'namimg' :-) ... Jon's work needs a good interface attached
to it to become a 'useable by all' emailer.
I haven't seen his work. However, the mail client I plan to do will be
functional, text-based, and probably fully open source.
I'm really planning to do it. Not having a power supply for my QL is the
biggest challenge to doing anything! ;)
Dave
ql.spodmail.com
Dave did you contact François Lanciault yet for the PSU?
Phoebus
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All I was saying was that TP has worked fine.
I have never used any other product 'cos of this.
I am not trying to be arrogant in any sense, and I am sorry if you
interpreted the bare words in this way.
No offence, Tony,
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Dave did you contact François Lanciault yet for the PSU?
No. I don't know who that is :o)
Sounds like I missed something when I should have been paying attention.
Could you email their contact details privately? :*)
Dave
ql.spodmail.com
At 02:33 ìì 7/4/2002, you wrote:
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Dave did you contact François Lanciault yet for the PSU?
No. I don't know who that is :o)
Sounds like I missed something when I should have been paying attention.
Could you email their contact details privately? :*)
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:11:32AM +0100, P Witte wrote:
was Re: [ql-users] DIANOUX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Waugh writes:
No need for tantrums lads, I think I started this merely by mentioning
that
I had received a virus twice from the same source, would you rather I had
kept quiet
In message 009f01c1de51$006f5ca0$20065cc3@default, Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Tarquin has already started to write a browser in beta form for the
QL -
he is also a RISC OS user - I have forgotten what he calls it.
Hyperbrowser
Ah ... yes, that's the one :-)
I have a copy, yet it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Nice idea of 'namimg' :-) ... Jon's work needs a good interface attached
to it to become a 'useable by all' emailer.
I haven't seen his work. However, the mail client I plan to do will be
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dexter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
Well I tried that. I registered, and it then invited me to login using
user name and password. Considering I had never registered a password,
that was difficult (8-)#
It emails the
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Probably best to have a look, then. Although I am a great believer in
alternatives ... it makes for more challenges.
Well here's the plan:
The program has a config file with sensible defaults. The first time it's
run it asks for your name, email
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Roy Wood wrote:
Actually I realise that The forum bit is different. I was referring to
ql-chat which I tried to log onto and have yet to receive a message on.
qlchat is on sabbatical. :o)
I'm reorganizing everything on the servers here. I now have a separate
mail
21 matches
Mail list logo
