Re: [ql-users] DIANOUX aftermath, OffT then OnT

2002-04-07 Thread Tony Firshman
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002 at 20:13:10, Geoff Wicks wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Original Message - From: P Witte [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] DIANOUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally, those who moan about Lookout Express should consider how they would feel about changing their

[ql-users] DIANOUX aftermath, OffT then OnT

2002-04-07 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geoff Wicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Many thanks, Per, you have expressed my feelings exactly not only in the above quote but in your whole piece. In about two years I have only caught a virus once and that was my own fault! (I caught it from a QL-user on this

Re: [ql-users] DIANOUX aftermath, OffT then OnT

2002-04-07 Thread Tony Firshman
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002 at 13:48:22, Richard Zidlicky wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 08:13:10PM +0100, Geoff Wicks wrote: It may be surprising for some but the QL actually had working email/news programs for maus and fido -nets long before MS - and at that time

Re: [ql-users] DIANOUX aftermath, OffT then OnT

2002-04-07 Thread Geoff Wicks
- Original Message - From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED] All I was saying was that TP has worked fine. I have never used any other product 'cos of this. I am not trying to be arrogant in any sense, and I am sorry if you interpreted the bare words in this way. No offence, Tony,

Re: [ql-users] DIANOUX aftermath, OffT then OnT

2002-04-06 Thread Geoff Wicks
- Original Message - From: P Witte [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users] DIANOUX [EMAIL PROTECTED] Finally, those who moan about Lookout Express should consider how they would feel about changing their system after using it for many (on the whole, happy) years. Taking such