Re: [ql-users] Drawing in the save area (SMSQ improvement)

2002-03-24 Thread ZN
On 3/18/02 at 9:14 AM Tony Firshman wrote: a) 'Regular' memory is generally quite substantially faster than screen memory Wasn't it 30%? I forgot to answer this one - actually, it's closer to 50% when compared to true no-wait-state RAM on a standard QL. Things quickly get worse once any

Re: [ql-users] Drawing in the save area (SMSQ improvement)

2002-03-18 Thread Tony Firshman
On Sun, 17 Mar 2002 at 18:17:21, ZN wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Joachim wrote: As I already mentioned, I am willing to volunteer for the following changes in SMSQ. - have all windows draw their contents in the save area - background update of windows (same mechanism) Ye! :-) In

Re: [ql-users] Drawing in the save area (SMSQ improvement)

2002-03-18 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
How does the second screen concept fit into all this? ... sorry if you said but there was a _lot_ of text (8-)# It is not considered. However, this could easily be emulted by swapping the save area for another one and setting all the changed flags. Question is, whatfor? Which program needs

Re: [ql-users] Drawing in the save area (SMSQ improvement)

2002-03-17 Thread ZN
Joachim wrote: As I already mentioned, I am willing to volunteer for the following changes in SMSQ. - have all windows draw their contents in the save area - background update of windows (same mechanism) Ye! :-) In general I propose the following changes. - Application should not draw