Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Source Code, general

2002-04-09 Thread wlenerz
On 8 Apr 2002, at 14:34, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote: -not done via a Website or FTP. Not a safe way, sourceforge does not (always) use either, but it uses CVS. To make this safer, change it to not done electronically, with the exception of email or something similar. OK, I'll do that,

Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Source Code, general

2002-04-09 Thread wlenerz
On 8 Apr 2002, at 15:47, Richard Zidlicky wrote: probably wrong. It indicates that the provisorial license was so badly formulated that everyone found his loophole in it and was happy. Yes, that's another way of looking at it -so I was overly optimistic, then. the point is that with a

Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Source Code, general

2002-04-08 Thread wlenerz
Hi all, Thank you all for your patience whilst waiting for me to read and digest all of your comments. I hope most of your concerns will be addessed below. I now have had enough time to read all your replies, requests comments and criticisms very carefully. I'll be replying to some emails in

Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Source Code, general

2002-04-08 Thread Joachim Van der Auwera
-not done via a Website or FTP. Not a safe way, sourceforge does not (always) use either, but it uses CVS. To make this safer, change it to not done electronically, with the exception of email or something similar. Joachim

Re: [ql-users] SMSQ/E Source Code, general

2002-04-08 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:34:31AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Thank you all for your patience whilst waiting for me to read and digest all of your comments. I hope most of your concerns will be addessed below. I now have had enough time to read all your replies, requests