- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Happy New Year (and with a BITTER lesson to be lea
rned) Love Live QLs
My laptop is is dual boot (with the OS in separate partitions so
Win956 ? I think I miss something ;-)
I run QPC2 on WinME now and I have no more problems than with W98 (that is
far lesser than with virii from Internet).
Why WME got such a bad reputation ?
Upgrading PC from end user like me includes getting the OS onboard (and
there is no more genuine CD, only
Win956 ? I think I miss something ;-)
Oops, my typo :o(
Norman.
-
Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:27:56 - , Norman Dunbar wrote:
Well, I'm running QPC2v2 on Win2k - what's wrong with it ?
Apart from being slowest than Win95, more bloated (if at all
possible) and giving you no way to run in TRUE DOS (a MUST on
desktop PCs for QXL !), nothing is wrong...
Win956 is
From: Thierry Godefroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu 03/Jan/2002 16:06 GMT
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Happy New Year (and with a BITTER lesson to be lea rned)
Love Live QLs
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:27:56 - , Norman Dunbar wrote:
Well, I'm running QPC2v2
At 06:28 ìì 3/1/2002 +, you wrote:
From: Thierry Godefroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu 03/Jan/2002 16:06 GMT
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Happy New Year (and with a BITTER lesson to be
lea rned) Love Live QLs
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 15:27:56 - ,
In article 20020103182853.UAJA1008.fep02-svc.ttyl.com@localhost,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
From: Thierry Godefroy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu 03/Jan/2002 16:06 GMT
To: ql-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Happy New Year (and with a BITTER lesson to be lea
rned) Love Live QLs
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Norman
Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Well, I'm running QPC2v2 on Win2k - what's wrong with it ?
Win956 is way too flakey for anything - 'real' Windows programmers refer to
it as Windows Play Station due to its inability to be used for anything
other than games.
Dave Walker writes:
My experience is that as long as you ahve at least 128Mb of memory then
Win2K outperformas any of the Win9x variants.
I agree (apart from booting and shutdown which are annoyingly slow) It is
also much more stable than any other variant of windoze Ive tried. W95OSR2
cant be
