Re: [ql-users] another float question

2001-05-19 Thread P Witte
ZN writes: ...on the QL the implied 1, IIRC, is not removed, so the mantissa is really a mantissa, not a fraction. I buy that explanation ;) Per

RE: [ql-users] another float question

2001-05-18 Thread Claude Mourier 00
Il me semble qu'à l'origine la pub parlait 10^512 et 10^-512 ou quelque chose comme ça (qui n'a guère de sens avec seulement 7 chiffres significatifs) -Message d'origine- De : Jerome Grimbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Envoyé : vendredi 18 mai 2001 10:17 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet :

RE: [ql-users] another float question

2001-05-18 Thread Norman Dunbar
-Original Message- From: Claude Mourier 00 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Il me semble qu'à l'origine la pub parlait 10^512 et 10^-512 ou quelque chose comme ça (qui n'a guère de sens avec seulement 7 chiffres significatifs) That's easy for you to say :o) I thought it was about 10^604

Re: [ql-users] another float question

2001-05-18 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Jerome Grimbert wrote: I have a strange question about float number: what are the maximal and minimal values for a float, on the QL. That should be from 1E-620 to 1.615850285E616. Marcel

RE: [ql-users] another float question

2001-05-18 Thread Ian . Pine
The M68000 Family Programmer's Reference Manual (which covers the 68040) states the range of a double precision real as 2.2 x 10^-308 to 1.8 x 10^308. It is an eight byte format as shown: 63 6252 51 0 -- |s|exponent|fraction| (They use 'fraction' instead of

Re: [ql-users] another float question

2001-05-18 Thread ZN
The M68000 Family Programmer's Reference Manual (which covers the 68040) states the range of a double precision real as 2.2 x 10^-308 to 1.8 x 10^308. It is an eight byte format as shown: This has nothing to do the with QL FP format. The format QDOS uses is not IEEE compatible. IIRC the