: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: SV: [ql-users] Nut cutlets - NO QL
On Mar 8, 7:40pm, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
I agree that programming on the QL is in fatc quite a joy - once you
have made the effort to learn how to do it.
Programming on the PC (either in Windows or Linux) is easier from
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Timothy Swenson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Mar 8, 7:40pm, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
I agree that programming on the QL is in fatc quite a joy - once you
have made the effort to learn how to do it.
Programming on the PC (either in Windows or Linux) is easier from
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
At the risk of severe flaming :
Why :-)
I am basically (no pun intended) a programmer at heart.
I like to program.
On the QL, programming is fun because yoy know how to get close to the
hardware - if you want to - and people
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 at 14:27:22, Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Ref: 3AA6454A.23640.131A7C1@localhost)
On 7 Mar 2001, at 10:06, Tony Firshman wrote:
QL basic for instance is very much part of me now.
and what a good basic it is.
Oh yes.
And do you know what I like most about
On Mar 7, 9:30pm, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Not necessarily - you can compile procedures with QLib or make a Turbo
task into a keyword if you want, for example. In addition to named
procedures in S*BASIC of course.
I know Qlib will create extensions, but I don't think TURBO will create an
