Hi Thierry,
The old debate should software be designed before hardware ? is a
nonsense to me
I didn't mean to say that software should be designed before hardware.
When I designed the Q40/Q60, there was no software at all!!!
For me, there are two software-related conditions, before I implement
On 1/6/02 at 7:32 AM Thierry Godefroy wrote:
[PCI on the QL]
the problems are QDOS specific...
...Not many people around who have the thorough knowledge about the
hardware and software to write more complicated drivers.
True, but knowledge can be acquired by anyone, the problem being the
The latest updates to my website include:
Gwass Assembler v4.15 from George Gwilt, which now allows input of
decimal numbers in the range -2^31 to 2^32, which now accords with HEX
and BIN input.
TurboPTR v4.2 from George Gwilt. Various changes, see the 'changes'
file in this download.
Bmp2Pic
On Sun, 06 Jan 2002 16:40:03 +0100, Peter Graf wrote:
Hi Thierry,
The old debate should software be designed before hardware ? is a
nonsense to me
I didn't mean to say that software should be designed before hardware.
No, but as I wrote, this is an old debate (GoldFire etc..). Please,
TT himself explained how to link new modules into SMSQ/E (in QL Today
or
IQLR IIRC), he did not mention any copyright restriction. I think
that
this would not pose any problem as long as you ask him. Another way
around
IQLR, Vol 5 Issue 1 (May 1995) where Tony showed how to add language
In article 003c01c195d2$a700c1c0$86065cc3@default, Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I take it from recent posts that W98 is not the ideal platform
for QPC2 and SMSQ/E? Or anything else it seems, by my
experience lately.
clip
Basically, if a version of Windows works well and is stable on
In article 00e401c19608$35713180$d225fea9@johns, John Hitchcock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
clip
Little Willie, ageing some(!)
Waits for a production run
Sinclair schematics all are shredded
His next love... will be embedded!
(if he's
On Sun, 06 Jan 2002 12:57:12 -0500, ZN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/6/02 at 7:32 AM Thierry Godefroy wrote:
[PCI on the QL]
the problems are QDOS specific...
...Not many people around who have the thorough knowledge about the
hardware and software to write more complicated drivers.
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imagine if Sinclair had been successful since the late 1980's,
and QDOS
was the dominant OS ... then people may have written Windows
emulators
to run on 'QDOS2000' :-)
I suspect that if Sir Clive was was driven by whatever
At 02:32 PM 1/6/2002 -0200, you wrote:
4) What shall I use to:
A) wordprocessor
B) spreadsheet (w/ .xls translation or something similar)
C) database (not complex, just for a collection control)
Xchange is probably the best program to
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 07:32:14AM +0100, Thierry Godefroy wrote:
the problems are QDOS specific:
- drivers can be practically written only in assembler,
True, but as far as I am concerned (I don't want to restart the assembler vs
C flame war), this is not a problem but a GOOD THING !
At 12:24 AM 1/7/2002 +0100, you wrote:
So, expected QDOS behavior is not there.
you have missed the 'qdos-like' flag, it does exactly that and a bit more.
Use it for filesystems that are intended for QL/UQLX use only, otherwise
you might get some confusion.
Indeed I must have. Next time I
1) What is the best way to plug SuperGoldCard, QUBIDE and cables,
AT powersupply (for floppy and HD), floppy and HD to QL. May I put it
all in a box and plug QUBIDE to QL using a flex cable?
Yes indeed you can use a Qplane or an Mplane. Mplane, from T.F. Services
is the better option.
13 matches
Mail list logo
