[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) May I suggest Aurora + Gold Card return 22 and Aurora + Super Gold Card
return 23. This is because, even without SMSQ/e, using:
PEEK (SYS_BASE+HEX('A7'))31
returns 10 and 12 for Gold Card/Super Gold Card respectively, even when
plugged into a standard QL.
The
In a message dated 26/01/03 14:12:06 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might under SMSQ/e !! but not under Minerva...
Minerva fills this system variable at all? Interesting.
But it IS defined. No need to do another, incompatible definition.
Is it
Whilst on the subject, what is the best way of checking if QPC, QXL or Aurora have the extended colour drivers available
--
Rich Mellor
RWAP Software
35 Chantry Croft, Kinsley, Pontefract, West Yorkshire, WF9 5JH
TEL: 01977 610509
http://hometown.aol.co.uk/rwapsoftware
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never intended in either GWASL or GWASS to go to the trouble of evaluating
expressions except in a simple way. That is in both assemblers evaluation
is done from left to right ignoring implied brackets (parentheses) so
Well, I can see why you did it this way. But
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I usually produce sprites which contain mode4, mode 8 and mode 33 versions
indise the code. To find out what they look like in practice I use my own
tspr program which displays the sprites against a 3-colour background. This
program is part of TurboPTR.
Perhaps
On 25 Jan 2003, at 16:04, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
No, fortunately not. Otherwise I would be as depressed as Marvin (as
anybody hitchhiking through the galaxy should now) ;-)
Does that mean that you're an android?
Now THAT explains a lot...
Don't panic...
Wolfgang
-
On 26 Jan 2003, at 15:51, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
He has to be an android as he has been working around the clock
apparently... at a certain point he sent me more than 3 versions in
less than 20 mins ;-))) (Okay just happened once but you get the idea)
Oh well, that only shows that we worked
On 27 Jan 2003, at 7:03, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Oh well, that only shows that we worked for 20 minutes
Oops, I meant of couse He worked (I didn't have anything to do with
it).
Just a typo
Wolfgang
??? 27/1/2003 1:03:28 ??, ?/? Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??:
On 26 Jan 2003, at 15:51, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
He has to be an android as he has been working around the clock
apparently... at a certain point he sent me more than 3 versions in
less than 20 mins ;-))) (Okay just
