Marcel Kilgus makes some magical things to make me read
} Jerome Grimbert wrote:
} > I have not yet seen the block operation in C for 24 bits colours...
}
} http://www.itimpi.freeserve.co.uk/ql/gd2b.zip
}
} iow_blkt ( chanid_t channel, timeout_t timeout, GDSTP_t *, QLRECT_t *rect)
Ok, will have
On 13 Oct 2003 at 15:58, Phoebus R. Dokos (è á. ç) wrote:
> As for Wolfgang's comments I would respectfully disagree.
Well, at least we can agree to disagree :-).
> As I said
> earlier it's anyone's choice how much they value their principles. Maybe
> Peter (and I do not speak for hi
On 13 Oct 2003 at 21:35, John Taylor wrote:
> Mutual admiration societies achieve nothing.
>
> There are differences of opinion in almost all aspects of QL computing.
> The 'licence' is just one of them. Long may this continue.
> All we have to do is just keep pushing.
>
Perhaps, though, some
On 13 Oct 2003 at 23:11, Peter Graf wrote:
> Well and we felt we walked 100 miles toward a compromise while you didn't
> move an inch.
Fortunately enough, then, the amendments to the licence, in reply to
your requests (and those of others) have been done publicly, in this
forum, so I'll let e
On 13 Oct 2003 at 19:44, Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντό wrote:
> That is not possible under any legal agreement. It's other one or the
> other especially for GPL style licenses as the premise is so different
> that it is impossible to do so.
Yes, I think I'd agree with you on that in a strict v
On 14 Oct 2003 at 3:13, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
(...)
> Yes, if I was motivated by $$$ I would have left the scene several
> years ago, I'd have to sell at least 1 QPC per hour to really make it
> commercially viable for me. But writing computer software is my only
> income and therefore I must some
"Phoebus R. Dokos (F??ß?? ?. ?t)" wrote:
> That is not possible under any legal agreement. It's other one or the
> other especially for GPL style licenses as the premise is so different
> that it is impossible to do so.
I can release my software under any number of licences I chose to do.
I
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:41:37 +0200, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nobody is stopping anybody from releasing a piece of code under 2
licenses.
That is not possible under any legal agreement. It's other one or the
other especially for GPL style licenses as the premise is so different
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jerome
Grimbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Fabrizio Diversi makes some magical things to make me read
} Just a thought about what a pity,( I am now in the lunch break...)
} one year later after sms/e sources new license, and for a lot of
reason that I do not under
"Phoebus R. Dokos (Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò)" wrote:
> My personal plans for SMSQ/E concern my (unfished yet) multilingual
> keyboard driver, greek language module (ready needs to be tested with the
> latest SMSQ/E), an independent driver for the Aurora for 16 colours and to
> help Daniele Terdina with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11 Oct 2003 at 23:17, Peter Graf wrote:
(...)
> Q60 Successor:
>
>(...)
> After the departure of Tony Tebby,
> I see no basis for projects like this anymore, because there's no
common ground
> with the new SMSQ/E maintainers,
Well of course not, you never tried to
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 21:35:50 +0100, John Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well I think that this whole discussion is an overkill. We did it before
but it may be useful to see things a little more removed from the heat
now
:-)
Phoebus
Mutual admiration societies achieve nothing.
There are di
> Well I think that this whole discussion is an overkill. We did it before
> but it may be useful to see things a little more removed from the heat now
> :-)
Phoebus
Mutual admiration societies achieve nothing.
There are differences of opinion in almost all aspects of QL computing.
The 'licenc
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:48:32 +0200 (MET DST), Jerome Grimbert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fabrizio Diversi makes some magical things to make me read
} Just a thought about what a pity,( I am now in the lunch break...)
} one year later after sms/e sources new license, and for a lot of
reason that
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:56:26 +0100, gwicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Marcel Kilgus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL??
My solution regarding postscript would also very much solve the
problem for Qxx. SGC i
- Original Message -
From: "Marcel Kilgus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ql-users] What printers do people use with their QL??
> My solution regarding postscript would also very much solve the
> problem for Qxx. SGC is probably too slow or doesn't have enough
> memory to run Ghosts
I remind to everybody that on Sunday the 26th of October will be held the 10th QL
Italian Meeting. Meeting starts at 10 am and ends at 4pm.
Place (same as the last 7 years): "Salone Civico Zavattini" - Circoscrizione 2 - Via
Fratelli Cervi 70 - Pieve Modolena, Reggio Emilia
Additional informa
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
> I have not yet seen the block operation in C for 24 bits colours...
http://www.itimpi.freeserve.co.uk/ql/gd2b.zip
iow_blkt ( chanid_t channel, timeout_t timeout, GDSTP_t *, QLRECT_t *rect)
> Means I will have to enter "debug/patch kernel" mode before continuing
> the hi
Fabrizio Diversi makes some magical things to make me read
} Just a thought about what a pity,( I am now in the lunch break...)
} one year later after sms/e sources new license, and for a lot of reason that I do
not understand (!!) nothing was done on the Q40 side, not because missing of knowled
Just a thought about what a pity,( I am now in the lunch break...)
one year later after sms/e sources new license, and for a lot of reason that I do not understand (!!) nothing was done on the Q40 side, not because missing of knowledge but for other reasons.
The new license is not perfect (far ?) b
On 13 Oct 2003 at 8:51, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
> Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version
> (sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra).
Further to my earlier email, I could, if that is wished, publish the
changes_txt file here on the list.
Any op
On 13 Oct 2003 at 8:51, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
>> Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version
> (sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra).
No, not to my knowledge.
I do keep a list of bugs that are sent to me/published here on the list.
Yours will be
On 11 Oct 2003 at 23:17, Peter Graf wrote:
(...)
> Q60 Successor:
>
>(...)
> After the departure of Tony Tebby,
> I see no basis for projects like this anymore, because there's no common ground
> with the new SMSQ/E maintainers,
Well of course not, you never tried to find one.
> and at the
Marcel Kilgus makes some magical things to make me read
}
} Jerome Grimbert wrote:
} > Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version
} > (sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra).
}
} Normally http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/versionssms.html should be
} up-
Jerome Grimbert wrote:
> Is there any uptodate Web page listing the know/resolved bugs with version
> (sort of changes.txt, with pending bugs listed as extra).
Normally http://www.kilgus.net/qpc/versionssms.html should be
up-to-date (though due to some special circumstances this time it
isn't yet
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify us immediately at
26 matches
Mail list logo
