-
-Original Message-
From: Phoebus Dokos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ql-users] SMSQ Source upgrading, assembling.
At 06:47 ðì 11/7/2002, you wrote:
UAE is Unix Amiga Emulator
Phoebus
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 July 2002 11:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] SMSQ Source upgrading, assembling.
This makes good sense and is a resonable plan for the future.
The only problem with the conversion to C is that it may not
fit into an old
machine
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:48:17PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/07/02 15:01:10 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
How much of an effort would it be to change GWASS itself to run on a 68000
or 68008 based QL??
Far too much I'm afraid!
no
-
-Original Message-
From: Richard Zidlicky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] SMSQ Source upgrading, assembling.
no problem, QLay is UAE based and thus could be easilly tweaked to
support
United Arab Emirates.
Tsk. didn yu lern nuffink wen yu wos at scool? ;O)
-Original Message-
From: Norman Dunbar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 July 2002 11:22
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ql-users] SMSQ Source upgrading, assembling.
Richard,
excuse my complete
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ql-users] SMSQ Source upgrading, assembling.
United Arab Emirates.
Tsk. didn yu lern nuffink wen yu wos at scool? ;O)
This email is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and
may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
at scool? ;O)
-Original Message-
From: Norman Dunbar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 July 2002 11:22
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ql-users] SMSQ Source upgrading, assembling.
Richard,
excuse my complete ignorance, but what is 'UAE' ?
Regards,
Norman
Did you know Dr Grant in Elgin?
Regards
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.macnamaras.com
- Original Message -
From: Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:27 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] SMSQ Source upgrading, assembling.
Seafield Primary
In a message dated 10/07/02 15:01:10 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How much of an effort would it be to change GWASS itself to run on a 68000 or 68008 based QL??
I thought I had answered that. The answer "quite a lot". I would imagine it might even be as much effort as
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Norman
Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Seafield Primary School - Elgin.
Elgin Academy - Elgin.
Moray College of Further Education - Elgin.
Have you got any of those Elgin marbles left over from your school days
? I hear the Greek government is looking for some.
At 06:47 ðì 11/7/2002, you wrote:
Ian,
Nice one :o)
I knew that UAE was United Arab Emirates, but I thought it was something to
do with some fancy computing term like ELF, SROFF etc etc.
UAE is Unix Amiga Emulator
Phoebus
This makes good sense and is a resonable plan for the future.
The only problem with the conversion to C is that it may not fit into an old
machine.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: [ql-users] SMSQ
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:07:27PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, when I was at school the UAE hadn't been invented :o)
I left in 1981; not sure when UAE was formed.
Haven't a clue what UAE means in this context, but I'd guess the U means universal.
U=Unix
Richard
: [ql-users] SMSQ Source upgrading, assembling.
On 8 Jul 2002, at 23:55, John Sadler wrote:
Are we in danger of restricting SMSQE to be assembled with Qmac
restricting ourselves to 68000 code, casting aside all those
QLers who
have invested in a Super Gold Card, QXL, Q40 or Q60?
Let's
In a message dated 09/07/02 21:00:37 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not convinced How difficult would it be George, to allow GWASS to work on the 68000 chipset??
GWASS needs a 68020+ to operate. But it can produce code siutable for 68000/8 (ie the basic instruction
In a message dated 10/07/02 13:38:58 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not convinced How difficult would it be George, to allow GWASS to work on the 68000 chipset??
GWASS needs a 68020+ to operate. But it can produce code siutable for 68000/8 (ie the basic instruction
On 10/07/02 at 09:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George - I think that you are missing the point here.
...
However, the fact remains that a lot of SMSQ/E developers use
computers/emulators which do not support 68020+ and therefore cannot run
GWASS to write the code...
How much of an effort would
17 matches
Mail list logo
