Yes but none of the emulate the higher instructions!!
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 6:42 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QXL: SMSQ
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Roy wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In
Hi all,
Could someone help me with the following procedures?
CURSPRON
CURSPROFF
CURSPRLOAD
SYSSPRLOAD
What do these stand for?
What do they do?
What about the syntax?
Many thanks,
François Van Emelen
___
QL-Users Mailing List
David Tubbs writes:
As a matter of interest I think the economical and time-saving approach is
to let QXL format a file
create a dummy file of sufficient length.
In PC mode use a hex editor to overwrite with required data !
qxltool does pretty much just that - saving you the trouble of
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:19:26 +0100, P Witte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
David Tubbs writes:
As a matter of interest I think the economical and time-saving approach
is
to let QXL format a file
create a dummy file of sufficient length.
In PC mode use a hex editor to overwrite with required data !
At 16:19 25/09/2004 +0100, you wrote:
David Tubbs writes:
As a matter of interest I think the economical and time-saving approach is
to let QXL format a file
create a dummy file of sufficient length.
In PC mode use a hex editor to overwrite with required data !
qxltool does pretty much just
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Sadler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Yes but none of the emulate the higher instructions!!
And you need these for ?
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill, Portslade, Sussex.BN41 2LB
Tel: +44 (0) 1273 386030fax: +44 (0) 1273 430501
web :
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:36:08 +0100, Roy wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Sadler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Yes but none of the emulate the higher instructions!!
And you need these for ?
Many, many, many, many things :-)
SMSQ/e for example could be 20-30%
Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
SMSQ/e for example could be 20-30% faster by using 68020+ instructions on
the SGC/Qx0/QXL machines :-)
This assumption is based on what exactly?
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:33:33 +0200, Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
SMSQ/e for example could be 20-30% faster by using 68020+ instructions
on
the SGC/Qx0/QXL machines :-)
This assumption is based on what exactly?
On how much faster 68020+ instructions work
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 04:22:05 +0200, Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
This assumption is based on what exactly?
On how much faster 68020+ instructions work performing tasks that need a
series of 68000 instructions to normally perform.
So this assumes that all or
10 matches
Mail list logo