Jim and John
You have missed the point of my post.
I would have had an agreement, a simpler one, not something dreamt up by an amateur lawyer who is trying to impress.
What I am still trying to say is, put a proposal before the committee and all they see is problems.
Opportunities don't seem to get a look in.
QL2004? That proposal was an opportunity. The committee killed it. It was successful in spite of their antipathy.
QL2005? That too was on it's deathbed and suddenly it is being resurrected in October!
The credit for this must lay with Geoff Wicks. Involuntary activity is not a committee phenomenon.
Now I see we are going to have a committee meeting at Byefleet on Saturday.
I wonder what brought that sudden rush of blood to the head, or have they got a proposal?
We shall see, but I fear my breath will be severely bated.
All the discussion has taken place here.
Why do we have no discussion in the magazine?
The scope for the committee to promote the QL is still there. Let's have no more excuses.
Just do what you have to do properly and promptly.
_______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
