wnload by those users like me who generally do not return disks for full
updates very often?
Dilwyn Jones
>
> From: Roy wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/02/24 Thu AM 12:03:59 GMT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited
>
> In messag
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, François Van Emelen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
Wolfgang Lenerz schreef:
No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
Wolfgang
Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE I thought we would
get the latest version of Sernet with each new version of SMSQE. It
se
wolfgang mühlegger schreef:
Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb:
On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote:
No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
??
I didn't even know that!
Wolfgang
:-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk :-))
wolfgang
Than
That explains why I thought that it was part of SMSQE
Arnould
> >>Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
> >
> > ??
> > I didn't even know that!
> > Wolfgang
> >
> >
> :-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk :-))
>
> wolfgang
WebMail / Magic OnLine
Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb:
On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote:
(...)
No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
??
I didn't even know that!
Wolfgang
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
__
On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote:
(...)
> > No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
> >
> Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
??
I didn't even know that!
Wolfgang
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
___
Wolfgang Lenerz schreef:
No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
Wolfgang
Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE I thought we
would get the latest version of Sernet with each new version of
SMSQE. It seems I was wrong about that.
Thanks
François Van Emelen
_
On 23 Feb 2005 at 17:42, François Van Emelen wrote:
(...)
. I suppose you are referring to a more recent one,
> probably available with the next version of SMSQE?
No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
Wolfgang
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
___
François Van Emelen wrote:
> Thanks for the info, but SNET_BAD%,SNET_RETRIES%,
> SNET_CONNECT%,SNET_STATION%, SNET_TEST%(X) are not present in my
> version (2.25). I suppose you are referring to a more recent one,
> probably available with the next version of SMSQE?
The version in my disc is 3.0
Marcel Kilgus schreef:
François Van Emelen wrote:
Here they are: SBAD%,
In my sources it's called SNET_BAD% and returns the number of bad
packets.
SRES%,
In current versions this is called SNET_RETRIES% and returns the
number of retries done.
SNET_C%,
> This is probably SNET_CONNECT% now, which re
François Van Emelen wrote:
> Here they are: SBAD%,
In my sources it's called SNET_BAD% and returns the number of bad
packets.
> SRES%,
In current versions this is called SNET_RETRIES% and returns the
number of retries done.
> SNET_C%,
This is probably SNET_CONNECT% now, which returns whether i
François Van Emelen wrote:
> While updating my 'Sbasic keywords list' I discovered some new
> functions related to SERNET.
> Here they are: SBAD%,SRES%,SNET_C%,SNET_N%.
> What do these names stand for, what about their syntax?
> Any idea where I can find some explanation about them?
> François Van
12 matches
Mail list logo
