RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread Darren Branagh

Hi Stuart,

First of all welcome to the group - I hope you choose to stay. You'll find
we're a friendly bunch, eager to help, and the only stupid question is the
one you don't ask. Do you intend to use your QL more often now or are you
just going to tinker for curiosity value?

The DP QL Collection ceased being sold many years ago. There was a recent
debate here regarding the status of many of the programs, and one, The
Perfection Word processor, is (I think) due to be released as freeware.

A namesake, Dilwyn Jones, recently made contact with the Owner of Digital
Precision - Freddy Vaccha. Dilwyn - when you spoke to Freddy, did you
mention any of the other programs in the collection, with a view to maybe
making most or possibly all of them freeware?

The DP collection was a wonderful collection of software, and it would be
great to get all of these into the Public Domain. Or course, many of the
programs have been superseded by something better, but for nostalgia
purposes I feel it's important these programs are retained - they were such
an important part of QL History.

Any feedback?

Darren.


   

-Original Message-
From: Stuart Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 16 May 2005 21:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

Dear All,

 

I have been out of the QL scene for many years but for nostalgic reasons
would like to acquire the set of Digital Precision software disks (the
collection), which I believe were on 10 disks.  They were sold around 10
years ago, but at the time I couldn't afford them.

 

If anyone would be willing to sell me a copy at a reasonable price, could
the please contact me at:

 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Thanks,

 

Stuart Jones

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread Dilwyn Jones
 First of all welcome to the group - I hope you choose to stay. You'll find
 we're a friendly bunch, eager to help, and the only stupid question is the
 one you don't ask. Do you intend to use your QL more often now or are you
 just going to tinker for curiosity value?
 
 The DP QL Collection ceased being sold many years ago. There was a recent
 debate here regarding the status of many of the programs, and one, The
 Perfection Word processor, is (I think) due to be released as freeware.
 
 A namesake, Dilwyn Jones, recently made contact with the Owner of Digital
 Precision - Freddy Vaccha. Dilwyn - when you spoke to Freddy, did you
 mention any of the other programs in the collection, with a view to maybe
 making most or possibly all of them freeware?
No, only Perfection word processor was mentioned. He indicated he'd be willing 
to allow that to be distributed as long as any changes made by the likes of 
David Gilham were to improve compatibility with emulators and modern QL 
hardware rather than adding any new commands etc to it, which I think is what 
David intended to do anyway.

Other than that, no positive news. Phoebus did ask me to ask him about 
Conqueror, but not got a reply on that one yet.

Stuart - I could probably get a free WANTED ad into QL Today magazine for you 
(if publisher Jochen Merz agrees and space permits) to see if anyone wishes to 
sell their copy of the DP bundle. Let me know if you'd like to try this.

Dilwyn Jones

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread John Hall
Dilwyn Jones wrote:

 Stuart - I could probably get a free WANTED ad into QL Today
 magazine for you (if publisher Jochen Merz agrees and space permits)
 to see if anyone wishes to sell their copy of the DP bundle. Let me
 know if you'd like to try this.

Of course, anyone who did sell or otherwise pass on their DP bundle
would be breaching the licence conditions but, 10 years on, I doubt if
even Freddy V. would be too concerned :-)

John


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


RE: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread Darren Branagh

This is one of the many things that bugs the hell out of me.

I wish there was a statute of limitations or similar on software, whereby
after x years the stuff became free. I'm sure freddy would agree to
releasing it as freeware, or certainly for a giveaway price. I mean, what
real use is a piece of 10 year old QL Software other than retro/curiosity
value? You're hardly gonna run the world with it...

There is so much good usable software out there and nobody knows its user
status - is it freeware, charityware, commercial, or what? And if we had
some certainty on a lot of this, a lot of users may be attracted back or
stay with the QL to use them, purely as tinkerers.

I can pick up a copy of PC World, Computer Shopper, PC Pro or any other PC
Magazine and find a pile of software (often once costing hundreds of pounds)
stuck to the front cover for the 4.99 cover price, and much of this is less
than 2-3 years of age. You usually find v.3 or whatever on the cover disc
with an offer to get the new v.4 inside at a reduced cost - yet here we are
debating the status of software that hasn't been sold at all, never mind
updated, for over a decade.

Why are people so reluctant to give this stuff away? There is no money in it
anymore. Just ask any trader :-)

END RANT/

Darren.


-Original Message-
From: John Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 17 May 2005 15:26
To: QL Users
Subject: Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

Dilwyn Jones wrote:

 Stuart - I could probably get a free WANTED ad into QL Today
 magazine for you (if publisher Jochen Merz agrees and space permits)
 to see if anyone wishes to sell their copy of the DP bundle. Let me
 know if you'd like to try this.

Of course, anyone who did sell or otherwise pass on their DP bundle
would be breaching the licence conditions but, 10 years on, I doubt if
even Freddy V. would be too concerned :-)

John


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread Derek Stewart
The DP package was not really worth the money... But I bought to support 
the QL scene.

There are much better software around which is free.
In fact most of the QL software that I bought is now free, I wonder if I 
have wasted money.

Derek
Darren Branagh wrote:
This is one of the many things that bugs the hell out of me.
I wish there was a statute of limitations or similar on software, whereby
after x years the stuff became free. I'm sure freddy would agree to
releasing it as freeware, or certainly for a giveaway price. I mean, what
real use is a piece of 10 year old QL Software other than retro/curiosity
value? You're hardly gonna run the world with it...
There is so much good usable software out there and nobody knows its user
status - is it freeware, charityware, commercial, or what? And if we had
some certainty on a lot of this, a lot of users may be attracted back or
stay with the QL to use them, purely as tinkerers.
I can pick up a copy of PC World, Computer Shopper, PC Pro or any other PC
Magazine and find a pile of software (often once costing hundreds of pounds)
stuck to the front cover for the 4.99 cover price, and much of this is less
than 2-3 years of age. You usually find v.3 or whatever on the cover disc
with an offer to get the new v.4 inside at a reduced cost - yet here we are
debating the status of software that hasn't been sold at all, never mind
updated, for over a decade.
Why are people so reluctant to give this stuff away? There is no money in it
anymore. Just ask any trader :-)
END RANT/
Darren.
-Original Message-
From: John Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 17 May 2005 15:26
To: QL Users
Subject: Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

Dilwyn Jones wrote:

Stuart - I could probably get a free WANTED ad into QL Today
magazine for you (if publisher Jochen Merz agrees and space permits)
to see if anyone wishes to sell their copy of the DP bundle. Let me
know if you'd like to try this.

Of course, anyone who did sell or otherwise pass on their DP bundle
would be breaching the licence conditions but, 10 years on, I doubt if
even Freddy V. would be too concerned :-)
John
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] Software behaving badly

2005-05-17 Thread Malcolm Cadman
I think it is time that we had a debate about what software we want for 
the original QL specification OS and its descendants, and what we want 
for the SMSQ  OS successor and even beyond ...

There seems to be only 2 licence types of software for the QL - software 
the costs and software that is free.  Shareware, or the like, doesn't 
really figure very much.

Then there are the compatibility issues with older software running on 
newer hardware or emulators.

What do people want to see happen ?
--
Malcolm Cadman
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread gwicks
- Original Message - 
From: Darren Branagh
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software


This is one of the many things that bugs the hell out of me.
I wish there was a statute of limitations or similar on software, 
whereby
after x years the stuff became free. I'm sure freddy would agree to
releasing it as freeware, or certainly for a giveaway price. I mean, what
real use is a piece of 10 year old QL Software other than retro/curiosity
value? You're hardly gonna run the world with it...

There is so much good usable software out there and nobody knows its user
status - is it freeware, charityware, commercial, or what? And if we had
some certainty on a lot of this, a lot of users may be attracted back or
stay with the QL to use them, purely as tinkerers.
I can pick up a copy of PC World, Computer Shopper, PC Pro or any other PC
Magazine and find a pile of software (often once costing hundreds of 
pounds)
stuck to the front cover for the 4.99 cover price, and much of this is 
less
than 2-3 years of age. You usually find v.3 or whatever on the cover disc
with an offer to get the new v.4 inside at a reduced cost - yet here we 
are
debating the status of software that hasn't been sold at all, never mind
updated, for over a decade.

Why are people so reluctant to give this stuff away? There is no money in 
it
anymore. Just ask any trader :-)

END RANT/
Don't forget Freddy V. may have sold the software, but that does not mean he 
is the copyright holder. I have said this many times before on this list. 
There are doubts about the copyright position of several of the ancilliary 
programs that formed part of the total Perfection package. When I enquired 
many years ago, no one was sure of the exact copyright status of 
Spellchecker, for example. If my memory serves me correctly when Turbo 
became PD permission had to be sought not just from Freddy V., but also the 
various authors,

Best Wishes,
Geoff 

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Tue, 17 May 2005 17:17:20 -0400, gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget Freddy V. may have sold the software, but that does not  
mean he is the copyright holder. I have said this many times before on  
this list. There are doubts about the copyright position of several of  
the ancilliary programs that formed part of the total Perfection  
package. When I enquired many years ago, no one was sure of the exact  
copyright status of Spellchecker, for example. If my memory serves me  
correctly when Turbo became PD permission had to be sought not just from  
Freddy V., but also the various authors,
It all depends on the agreements. If an author was acting as an agent  
(legalese of course) of DP then DP *IS* the copyright holder, unless their  
contract stated otherwise.

For example when it comes to Rich's software I do not hold any copyright  
over the pictures and sounds that I created nor the packaging of the  
software. Copyright for those was transfered to Rich when I agreed to the  
compensation scheme :-)

Similarily, Microsoft retains copyright of its software regardles of who  
is writing it (unless of course they steal it like Spyglass' software  
;-) )

Ffibys
P.S. I am back ;-)
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Tue, 17 May 2005 10:43:50 -0400, Darren Branagh  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I can pick up a copy of PC World, Computer Shopper, PC Pro or any other  
PC
Magazine and find a pile of software (often once costing hundreds of  
pounds)
stuck to the front cover for the 4.99 cover price, and much of this is  
less
than 2-3 years of age. You usually find v.3 or whatever on the cover disc
with an offer to get the new v.4 inside at a reduced cost - yet here we  
are
debating the status of software that hasn't been sold at all, never mind
updated, for over a decade.

Why are people so reluctant to give this stuff away? There is no money  
in it
anymore. Just ask any trader :-)


One of course would argue that QL Software (and indeed DP software would  
classify since it never had significant problems) is so good that it  
doesn't need to be updated ;-)

As for the PC world, recapturing investment may not be that important...  
we are talking about economies of scale here

Ffibys
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm