[ql-users] Online QL software library
Part of the QLCF (French group) software library is now available on the web. The address is http://jgrimbert.free.fr/galerie Part: only the non-french part is available to unregistered/anonymous users. The french part is only available to selected few. (due to legal restriction of the license under which contribution are received: you have to be a member of QLCF to get access to it. The sad point so far is that QLCF has stopped taking new memberships...) I hope to update it soon, as so far it's only upto 2000 status. (Well, most update since happened in the french-part, so that's not really a concern for most of readers... yet!) Then I should start documenting more explicitely the content of each zip archive (so far, it's a bit of random picking amongst the hundreds of available zip files...) I intend to grant access to the 'restricted' area on the following bases (still open to discussion with any QLCF members, I know some of them are reading this list): - you are on the official list of members, - or you donate a useful and new contribution (as QL software, no money!) to the library. In both cases, you should first register, then email the webmaster with the detail of your registration name, and either your true name (case 1) or your contribution (case 2). Then manual processing will occurs (that means, it can take upto a month (holidays!!!) before you get an answer. For instance: SBasic keyword extensions should be documented with either a quill document, or a bare text file, source file should be provided as well as binary. A loading boot file might be provided too, as well as a demonstration of use. All these files should have the same name, but a different suffix. Have a nice week. ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software/Undelete
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm told I was wrong - DRVlink and DRVchk were never supplied as SBASIC progs, they were always executables like the current ones. Hmmm - not wishing to disagree at all, but I think I might ! I'm almost 100% certain I once had a disc with these two programs in executable and SuperBasic source because I read the source to find out what they did and how they did it. As ever with TT's code, it's written in some foreign language and I didn't understand a word of it :o( It might have been on the QXL disc(s) or something, but I have seen the source (many years ago.) Bear in mind that my memory isn't all that great (I need a RAM upgrade to my head, probably a CPU upgrade as well) but as I said above, I'm almost 100% certain. Cheers, Norman. ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Re: [ql-users] QPC2/Windows
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Yes, Launchpad is good too. I have been reviewer and user of it since its 'launch' ... :-) ...and I leave such puns to Malcolm ;-) It comes with lots and lots of pre-defined icons for all your favourite programs. So the high colour version will look even better ... no doubt Dilwyn is hammering away with Easy Pointer4 as we speak. -- Malcolm Cadman Sort of...last couple of weeks has seen NO progress whatsoever due to pressures of work. But it will happen, although do bear in mind the original Launchpad took about 2 years! (though as I actually use it myself, I do want it to happen for my own use as much as anything else!). The nice thing is, I can update it almost as I go along so it ends up under continuous test here each time new menus are linked and cxompiled. Such is the ease of producing apps with Easyptr! All to the good, then. Looking forward to progress. -- Malcolm Cadman ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
