Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers

2004-10-20 Thread SMSQ - Jochen Merz
Put another way my life is not dominated by the QL. When I have to buy a new
printer there will be a lot of things I shall take into account in making my
choice and the QL is just one of them. I am not going to waste time or money
looking for a QL compatible printer when the QL community has pussyfooted
for years on solving the problem.
More provocatively, in April 2004 three leading lights of the QL community
sat on a Florida beach and decided that solving the printer problem was one
of the main tasks for the 12 months ahead. We are now almost halfway through
that 12 months. Could they give a progress report please?
Well, we did not decide it was one of the main tasks, we all KNOW
it is extremely important.
However, there does not seem to be an easy solution.
We discussed it several times later, but it still looks like
a very difficult task.
In the end, we need an easy-to-use, transparent solution,
which needs to work on more platforms than QPC.
This makes it even more difficult.
Jochen
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers

2004-10-20 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Marcel Kilgus
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers


 gwicks wrote:
  More provocatively, in April 2004 three leading lights of the QL
community
  sat on a Florida beach and decided that solving the printer problem was
one
  of the main tasks for the 12 months ahead. We are now almost halfway
through
  that 12 months. Could they give a progress report please?

 Third beach boy speaking. Thing is, I haven't printed from an QL
 system for probably a decade. *I* don't need printing. *Despite* this
 fact I put all the thoughts and work into it that I did. The response
 as you probably know was next to nil, so I pretty much stopped caring.


Thanks for the reply and to Jochen and Roy too. I did post this item a bit
tongue in cheek to illustrate the point that we are unlikely to get a quick
or easy solution to the printer problem.

In fact I am moving in the same direction as you. I prefer to do all Just
Words! work on a laser, which is cheaper and more durable than an inkjet. It
is easy to transfer to PC format via QL-2-PC Transfer and save to dos1_.
This can then be picked up by a PC program. Other QL output can be saved to
file and then transferred to PC. At the beginning of this year I moved all
my spreadsheets to PC. I prefer it because it is easier to use both Euros
and £s together in a spreadsheet and also much easier to print out because
PCs use vector fonts. Even LineDesign output can be transferred to PC
format.

Now wordprocessing..

Best Wishes,
Geoff


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers

2004-10-19 Thread SMSQ - Jochen Merz
studies to scrap direct printing from the QL completely.)
 Why?
I use an Epson 740 connected to PC by usb and at one and the same time
(can't spell simutainly) connected to a QL by parallel port ( it has a
mac port also ), although I can't say if this model or an equivalent is
still out there, Jochen would know maybe.
We are still using Stylus Color 740 and 900 together with QPC.
Both printers are rather old (4...5 years, maybe even older),
but print very well.
The Color 880 was the last model EPSON made which had the ESC/P2.
I also tried Canons, but recent models (SmartBase, or the brandnew
IP series) does not recognise a printer language.
You can send whatever you like to them - they do not even react at
all.
And to the obvious question - no I have never attempted printing from both
computers at the same time (;-)
I have not either, but they are all connected via USB anyway.
As far as I remember the manual does not say you can't use both
ports at the same time...
Jochen
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers

2004-10-19 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
From: Bill Waugh
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers



 - Original Message -
 From: gwicks
  - Original Message -
  Subject: [ql-users] Canon Printers

  I have a Canon BJ-200ex, which is my only QL compatible printer. About 8
  years old and getting obsolete with cartridges going up in price and
  probably becoming more difficult to obtain. (I am already doing
 feasibility
  studies to scrap direct printing from the QL completely.)

  Why?
 I use an Epson 740 connected to PC by usb and at one and the same time
 (can't spell simutainly) connected to a QL by parallel port ( it has a
 mac port also ), although I can't say if this model or an equivalent is
 still out there, Jochen would know maybe.


Very simple answer. I have a life.

Put another way my life is not dominated by the QL. When I have to buy a new
printer there will be a lot of things I shall take into account in making my
choice and the QL is just one of them. I am not going to waste time or money
looking for a QL compatible printer when the QL community has pussyfooted
for years on solving the problem.

More provocatively, in April 2004 three leading lights of the QL community
sat on a Florida beach and decided that solving the printer problem was one
of the main tasks for the 12 months ahead. We are now almost halfway through
that 12 months. Could they give a progress report please?

Best wishes,
Geoff Wicks.


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers

2004-10-18 Thread gwicks

- Original Message - 
Subject: [ql-users] Canon Printers


 I have never had any experience with Canon printers.

 However, someone has contacted me who needs to replace a Canon BJ-200
 printer - any suggestion, since I do not believe that they are Epson ESC/P
 compatible (or are they) ??

Sorry this reply is late - for obvious reasons.

I have a Canon BJ-200ex, which is my only QL compatible printer. About 8
years old and getting obsolete with cartridges going up in price and
probably becoming more difficult to obtain. (I am already doing feasibility
studies to scrap direct printing from the QL completely.)

Compatibility is BJ mode, which I have never used and Epson LQ mode but NOT
Epson ESC/P,

Best Wishes,
Geoff.

PS Hope to write about QL2004 and QL2005 tomorrow. Too tired today having
travelled from the Netherlands overnight.


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers

2004-10-14 Thread dilwyn.jones
Rich-Jochen and I were discussing Canon bubblejets and Epson compatibility a few days 
ago. I haven't got the email with me here at work, but if you can wait until tonight I 
can look up the info he gave me on the last Canon he knew to have ESC/P or ESC/P2. 
Alternatively, try their website, presumably canon.com or canon.co.uk to see if 
there's anything there, often they have a helpline email address even if what you want 
isn't on the website.

The only Canons I've owned have been Canon BJ10sx and BJC-70, both great little 
printers, but a bit ancient by now.

Up to a certain age, Canons had several emulations built in:
Epson LQ-xxx
Canon BJ modes
and one other whose name I can't recall now (possibly an IBM mode, although the Canon 
mode seems closer to IBM than Epson).

 I have never had any experience with Canon printers.
  
 However, someone has contacted me who needs to replace a Canon BJ-200  
 printer - any suggestion, since I do not believe that they are Epson ESC/P  
 compatible (or are they) ??
  
 If anyone has a second hand canon bubble jet for sale - let me know  asap.


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm


Re: Re: [ql-users] Canon Printers

2004-10-14 Thread dilwyn.jones
Darren Branagh wrote:
 I have a Brother injet printer, forget which model, which is esentially a
 rebranded Canon model sold under licence by Brother (it takes canon
 cartridges)
 
 It is the Brother version of a Canon printer Dilwyn owns/owned - which took
 single pages, ie. no sheet feeder. Which model was that Dilwyn? The small
 white one you used to bring to shows?
Canon BJ10sx. Black ink only. If it's one which has a colour cartridge and a little 
LCD panel on the front, it was the short lived BJC-70 (short lived because I dropped 
it and broke it, pity, great little printer).

There was another version called the BJ10ex. Don't know the difference.

Both highly recommended for home use. Ink cartridges seemed to last forever on the 
BJ10sx, although the BJC70 had fiddle little colour cartridges which were a pain to 
try to refill or change.

Dilwyn Jones

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm