Jim and John
You have missed the point of my post.
I would have had an agreement, a simpler one, not something dreamt up
by an amateur lawyer who is trying to impress.
What I am still trying to say is, put a proposal before the committee
and all they see is problems.
Opportunities don't seem to
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 at 19:52:45, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Ôçí Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:58:01 +,ï(ç) Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Ýãñáøå/wrote:
Did anyone establish what email addresses Dennis Smith and Derek Stewart
are using now.
The emails I have (and published in
In a message dated 11/11/2004 08:47:09 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Quanta site is tricky. I cannot see any mention of the committee
names in print. There is a a facsimile of the mag. This is in a
'clever' scrollable window and not copyable. It is very small, not
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman
I am though getting mail undelivered to [EMAIL PROTECTED] !
Can someone email me John's private address. It is not the
john @ nosuitsit . com that I have on file. The quanta address
gets diverted to that.
The above is the address the
Did anyone establish what email addresses Dennis Smith and Derek Stewart
are using now.
The emails I have (and published in their ads) are bouncing.
Tony
--
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255
tony@surname.co.uk http://www.firshman.co.uk
Voice: +44(0)1442-828254
Wed, 10 Nov 2004 22:58:01 +,() Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
Did anyone establish what email addresses Dennis Smith and Derek Stewart
are using now.
The emails I have (and published in their ads) are bouncing.
Tony
I have recently contacted Derek and his email didn't bounce...
