[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
manual... sample of which I sent to Marcel) but due to the birth of my son
.. however the time draws near ;-)
Morning Ffibys,
Congratulations due then ?
I'm intrigued by the mention that you will have 'time' soon to do some QL'ing -
how come you have time when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
manual... sample of which I sent to Marcel) but due to the birth of my son
.. however the time draws near ;-)
Morning Ffibys,
Congratulations due then ?
I'm intrigued by the mention that you will have 'time' soon to do some QL'ing
- how come you have
Should that be Ffibys 2.1 or 1.7? I think that, according to gov't
statisticians, is how many children couples actually have :-) .
Doug L. 37830 USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Apr 28, 2005 3:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ql-users] Ffibys version 2.0
[EMAIL
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:43:51 -0400, Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
manual... sample of which I sent to Marcel) but due to the birth of
my son
.. however the time draws near ;-)
Morning Ffibys,
Congratulations due then ?
I'm intrigued by the mention that
As long as you don't decide to install mistress 1.0 upgrade on top of
Wife 1.0, you should be fine!!
Darren.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 April 2005 17:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Ffibys version 2.0
On Thu, 28 Apr
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:05:35 -0400, Darren Branagh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As long as you don't decide to install mistress 1.0 upgrade on top of
Wife 1.0, you should be fine!!
Darren.
You obviously haven't seen my wife... Installing the Mistress 1.0 Service
Pack ;-) would definitely NOT be
