Re: [Ql-Users] Returning to the QL

2017-08-28 Thread Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users
Err, except it wasn't me wot wrote that, Norman!!! Dilwyn Dilwyn asked: "...has huge problems with local variables, which seem to lose their names when out of scope. If anyone knows how to reconnect local variables to their names when they are out of scope, please let me know. " Could you

Re: [Ql-Users] Returning to the QL

2017-08-28 Thread Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
Dilwyn asked: "...has huge problems with local variables, which seem to lose their names when out of scope. If anyone knows how to reconnect local variables to their names when they are out of scope, please let me know. " Could you explain, for the old and infirm (me), how you mean "goes out

Re: [Ql-Users] Returning to the QL

2017-08-28 Thread Daniel Baum via Ql-Users
Hi Norman, I (apparently) wrote this about 20 years ago. This has reminded me that the idea was to write some kind of debugger for superbasic, but I really don't remember how it worked. You're right of course about local variables. Perhaps my experience with programming since I wrote this will

Re: [Ql-Users] Returning to the QL

2017-08-28 Thread Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
Evening Daniel, Welcome back to the QL. I replied to Dilwyn earlier on this. I realise my mistake, as usual, only when my post went public. Sigh! No worries! Cheers, Norm. On 28 August 2017 09:32:38 BST, Daniel Baum via Ql-Users wrote: >Hi Norman, > >I

[Ql-Users] For 1 person only - or maybe just 2!

2017-08-28 Thread Geoff Wicks via Ql-Users
I have always said that one of the strengths of the QL is that it caters for minorities. For the one person - or maybe two people who are interested - the 2017 version of my UK General Election analysis program is now available on the downloads page of my website.

Re: [Ql-Users] Returning to the QL

2017-08-28 Thread Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users
Indeed Dilwyn, apologies, I was wondering about you having said it! However, the problem is simply my own apparent inability to read properly! Cheers, Norm. On 28 August 2017 09:40:20 BST, Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users wrote: >Err, except it wasn't me wot wrote that,

Re: [Ql-Users] For 1 person only - or maybe just 2!

2017-08-28 Thread Giorgio Garabello via Ql-Users
Hi Geoff, About your dictionaries ,, Qtyp is still a commercial program? Giorgio 2017-08-28 20:41 GMT+02:00 Geoff Wicks via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>: > > I have always said that one of the strengths of the QL is that it caters > for minorities. > > For the one person - or maybe two