Re: [Ql-Users] QA.RESRI - QDOSMSQ eference guide

2018-02-16 Thread Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users
On 15 February 2018 at 19:33, Tobias Fröschle via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote: > > 1. Not called from an S*BASIC context: --> return with nothing done, d0 > is what you put in, so not meant to report an error. Not really a valid use > case > > This _is_ a valid use case for

Re: [Ql-Users] QA.RESRI - QDOSMSQ eference guide

2018-02-16 Thread Tobias Fröschle via Ql-Users
> Am 16.02.2018 um 10:27 schrieb Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users > : > > On 15 February 2018 at 19:33, Tobias Fröschle via Ql-Users < > ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote: > > >>> 1. Not called from an S*BASIC context: --> return with nothing done, d0 >> is what you put

Re: [Ql-Users] QA.RESRI - QDOSMSQ eference guide

2018-02-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
On 16/02/2018 10:27, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote: <> What puzzles me however is that, in case more space from the system is needed, this is done using a call to sms.achp (mt.alchp) rather than mt.albas. So the extra space seems to be allocated in the Common Heap rather than the S*BASIC

Re: [Ql-Users] A polite request

2018-02-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
On 15/02/2018 21:07, Norman Dunbar via Ql-Users wrote: <> There is plenty one could moan about on this list if one were thus inclined. Nuff said. Oh, I would tend to disagree there. Respectfully disagree of course. I think this is one of the better lists I enjoy reading - even when the

Re: [Ql-Users] QA.RESRI - QDOSMSQ eference guide

2018-02-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
On 16/02/2018 12:50, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: On 16/02/2018 10:27, Jan Bredenbeek via Ql-Users wrote: <> SBASIC bahaves in much the same way as QLiberated programs. I guess QLib has always used the Common Heap for its names and variables, as SBASIC does now. Also a6 is fixed under both

Re: [Ql-Users] QA.RESRI - QDOSMSQ eference guide

2018-02-16 Thread pjwitte via Ql-Users
On 16/02/2018 22:12, pjwitte via Ql-Users wrote: <> If Ive understood correctly, SBASIC sets up each array in its own heap. This assumption was partially or wholly incorrect. Sorry. I'll shut up now. P ___ QL-Users Mailing List