Hi all,
How hard would it be to extend sBASIC functions to support C++ style
overloading?
Separately, does the sBASIC in SMSQ or Minerva still scan for
procedures/functions from the beginning of the program, so earlier FN/PROCs
have a speed advantage over later ones like in JM/JS?
--
Dave
On 20 June 2018 at 22:35, Dave Park via Ql-Users
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Separately, does the sBASIC in SMSQ or Minerva still scan for
> procedures/functions from the beginning of the program, so earlier FN/PROCs
> have a speed advantage over later ones like in JM/JS?
SuperBASIC (JM/JS/Minerva)
My reason for asking was, I was wondering if an analysis of how frequently
functions were called, and from where, could affect how quickly they would
be stepped to. I have seen this behavior in SuperBASIC on JM/JS and
achieved often useful gains in improvements by placing the most frequently
