Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: Stupid AND

2017-09-21 Thread Dave Park via Ql-Users
Well, no it wasn't. And we're all kids of the 80s. Hit us up :D On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Ralf Reköndt via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote: > Sorry, was private ;-)) > > > > Am 21.09.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Ralf Reköndt: > >> Hi Dilwyn, >> >> after a very long time, I need again

Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: Stupid AND

2017-09-21 Thread Ralf Reköndt via Ql-Users
Sorry, was private ;-)) Am 21.09.2017 um 20:40 schrieb Ralf Reköndt: Hi Dilwyn, after a very long time, I need again your help in identifying a song text. No need to hurry, if you ever get the time. I think, you may have heard this one in the 80s. Thank you. Cheers...Ralf

Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: Stupid AND

2017-09-21 Thread Ralf Reköndt via Ql-Users
Hi Dilwyn, after a very long time, I need again your help in identifying a song text. No need to hurry, if you ever get the time. I think, you may have heard this one in the 80s. Thank you. Cheers...Ralf ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: Stupid AND

2017-09-19 Thread Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users
yes, that's of course the right (and long-winded) way to do it, and I always remember that ... once my program has crashed. Wolfgang I know the feeling... :-) Dilwyn . ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] Fw: Stupid AND

2017-09-19 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz via Ql-Users
Hi, yes, that's of course the right (and long-winded) way to do it, and I always remember that ... once my program has crashed. Wolfgang through splitting up and building up to the final logcal value. The easiest way around this simple example is using two IFs instead of AND to ensure

[Ql-Users] Fw: Stupid AND

2017-09-19 Thread Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users
I take the point about other basics doing it differently, but this is how Sinclair BASIC has worked, by building up a value for the overall expression through splitting up and building up to the final logcal value. The easiest way around this simple example is using two IFs instead of AND to