Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA

2020-04-21 Thread Urs Koenig (QL) via Ql-Users
Simon wrote: > FREE Now Thanks Simon for pointing this to us. My membership somehow ran out end of 2017! And I missed to renew back then. I did now rejoin using the webform. QL forever! Best wishes to all QLers and stay healthy! Urs ___ QL-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA

2020-04-17 Thread Darren Branagh via Ql-Users
he-ql/magazine-archive-2/ > > Dilwyn > > -Original Message- > From: simon629--- via Ql-Users > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:06 PM > To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com > Cc: simon...@sky.com > Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA > > Thank you Dilwyn > How do I get Back Copy's >

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA

2020-04-17 Thread Dilwyn (gmail) via Ql-Users
days are available to download from the Quanta site https://quanta.org.uk/the-ql/magazine-archive-2/ Dilwyn -Original Message- From: simon629--- via Ql-Users Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 1:06 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Cc: simon...@sky.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Thank you

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA

2020-04-17 Thread simon629--- via Ql-Users
Thank you Dilwyn  How do I get Back Copy's Hi have most of them but I need The ones from 2015 2016 and 2017 in PDF Format Can You Help Me Dilwyn  OK All the Best Simon Foster On Friday, 17 April 2020, 12:37:20 BST, Dilwyn (gmail) via Ql-Users wrote: Read the JOIN QUANTA page on the

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA

2020-04-17 Thread Dilwyn (gmail) via Ql-Users
Read the JOIN QUANTA page on the MEMBERS tab on Quanta website at www.quanta.org.uk - I quote: "Join QUANTA --- Membership: Full membership, with the magazine sent in PDF format by email, is now free but must be renewed on a yearly basis to keep in-line with GDPR regulations.

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta eMag

2018-03-16 Thread Derek Stewart via Ql-Users
On 15/03/18 18:51, Peter Graf via Ql-Users wrote: The printed QUANTA magazine for December/January arrived here today. Derek Stewart via Ql-Users wrote: Hi, Has anyone received the recent Quanta eMags, the last one I received in October/November 2017. My subscription is in date. I tried to

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta eMag

2018-03-15 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
The printed QUANTA magazine for December/January arrived here today. Derek Stewart via Ql-Users wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone received the recent Quanta eMags, the last one I received in > October/November 2017. My subscription is in date. > > I tried to email John Southern, but no reply, where

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta eMag

2018-03-09 Thread Peter Graf via Ql-Users
Hi Derek, I have the same problem with the magazines. I thought it was because I could not pay QUANTA subscription for some time. QUANTA had difficulties to tell their bank account information. I paid in January. Maybe it is because of Lee Privett passing, which we all understand. All the best

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta eMag

2018-03-09 Thread Dave Park via Ql-Users
I’ll be upset if it isn’t. I just recently paid to renew for 3 years. However, they have my utmost understanding. The magazine editor did recently pass away. I’d be happy to write a couple of things too. Dave On Friday, March 9, 2018, Derek Stewart via Ql-Users < ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com>

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

2017-07-30 Thread John Gilpin via Ql-Users
Hi George and others who have also missed the Apr/May issue of QUANTA eMag, After considerable investigation, it would appear that having sent the Apr/May Issue of QUANTA eMag out in two batches, I may have sent the same batch out twice! Some time ago, I sent out the eMag out as one batch but

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

2017-07-28 Thread Klaus Frank via Ql-Users
Hi John, Just to tell you, that the latest issue I have recieved is Feb/Mar 2017. Regards Klaus Frank Sendt fra min iPad > Den 23. jul. 2017 kl. 20.35 skrev John Southern via Ql-Users > : > > Hi All, > > I have taken over as the membership secretary. > > The

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

2017-07-28 Thread sba1derson via Ql-Users
Hi John, When can I expect delivery of my missing back issues of Quanta magazine please?  I sent you my e-mail details on the 24th July. Simon Balderson On 23 Jul 2017 19:35, John Southern via Ql-Users wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have taken over as the membership

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

2017-07-24 Thread via Ql-Users
> On 23 Jul 2017, at 19:35, John Southern via Ql-Users > wrote: > > Simon, Michael, Ian, you should have all received copies up to and > including April/May 2017. The latest QUANTA I have received is FEB/MAR 2017. George

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

2017-07-23 Thread John Southern via Ql-Users
Hi All, I have taken over as the membership secretary. The latest magazine is incredibly late and that is purely down to me and I am working through that today. Simon, Michael, Ian, you should have all received copies up to and including April/May 2017. Can you send me you email address to my

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

2017-07-23 Thread Michael Bulford via Ql-Users
I've received two issues this year, up to the Feb/March issue. None received since then. I did email John Gilpin last week, but no reply as yet. Michael Dilwyn wrote: > I've forwarded this to committee members (don't know the answer myself), > hopefully a reply soon. > > Dilwyn > >

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine

2017-07-23 Thread Dilwyn Jones via Ql-Users
I've forwarded this to committee members (don't know the answer myself), hopefully a reply soon. Dilwyn -Original Message- From: sba1derson via Ql-Users Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 9:08 AM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Magazine Has anyone received an electronic

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta News

2014-10-01 Thread Rich Mellor (RWAP)
Hi Dilwyn, If the magazine is due to come out after 11th October, please include details of the new QL Games Box-Sets (3, 4 and 5) as they will be launched at the show in Edinburgh Rich On October 1, 2014 at 6:55 PM Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk wrote: I’ll be putting together

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM Tomorrow (27th April 2014)

2014-04-27 Thread Derek Stewart
Do you have the link to the Virtual AGM... Regards, Derek On 27/04/14 02:25, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Me! (Skype if it works for me, conference if not) Dilwyn -Original Message- From: Rich Mellor (RWAP) Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:12 PM To: Mailing List, QL Subject: [Ql-Users]

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM Tomorrow (27th April 2014)

2014-04-27 Thread John Gilpin
Derek, As informed in the AGM booklet distributed to all QUANTA Members, the link is to contact Keith Dunbarwebad...@quanta.org.uk and he will tell you all. Kind Regards, John Gilpin. QUANTA Membership Secretary. members...@quanta.org.uk On 27/04/2014 09:01, Derek Stewart wrote: Do

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM Tomorrow (27th April 2014)

2014-04-27 Thread John Gilpin
If you want to join us at the AGM you can connect through Skype (add QUANTA.org to your contacts list) or you can dial in on a standard telephone line (please check the costs with your provider) by calling 0844 545 2121 and enter the pin 34285190 when prompted. Please join 5 minutes before to

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM Tomorrow (27th April 2014)

2014-04-26 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Me! (Skype if it works for me, conference if not) Dilwyn -Original Message- From: Rich Mellor (RWAP) Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 10:12 PM To: Mailing List, QL Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM Tomorrow (27th April 2014) Just a quick reminder that the Quanta AGM is happening tomorrow

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Workshop and AGM 2013 in Manchester

2013-04-09 Thread John Gilpin
Thanks Dilwyn, We hadn't noticed that whoever added the Workshop/AGM details to the QUANTA Web Site hadn't included the directions to get to the venue. However, I have asked Keith for a get together tomorrow in order to correct this. From your link to Google maps, It gives an address of 70,

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Web site down?

2012-10-19 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: matras...@aol.com Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 8:10 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Web site down? The Quanta site has been down for at least 2 days. Has Quanta closed down? Regards Duncan

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Web site down?

2012-10-19 Thread George Gwilt
On 19 Oct 2012, at 12:48, Geoff Wicks wrote: The Quanta site has been down for at least 2 days. Has Quanta closed down? Regards Duncan ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm I think the website has been

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Web site down?

2012-10-19 Thread Tony Firshman
George Gwilt wrote, on 19/Oct/12 17:10 | Oct19: Geirge (sic)/ On 19 Oct 2012, at 12:48, Geoff Wicks wrote: The Quanta site has been down for at least 2 days. Has Quanta closed down? Regards Duncan ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Web site down?

2012-10-19 Thread Tony Firshman
Tony Firshman wrote, on 19/Oct/12 17:22 | Oct19: George Gwilt wrote, on 19/Oct/12 17:10 | Oct19: Geirge (sic)/ On 19 Oct 2012, at 12:48, Geoff Wicks wrote: The Quanta site has been down for at least 2 days. Has Quanta closed down? Regards Duncan

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Web site down?

2012-10-19 Thread Tony Firshman
Norman Dunbar wrote, on 19/Oct/12 17:29 | Oct19: Geraldine Muchova, a Scot who loved through the communist Czech darkness and emerged with her integrity intact, has died at the great age of 95. It would be nice to imagine it wasn't a misprint. I gather, perhaps, that the communists didn't

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Web site down?

2012-10-18 Thread Tony Firshman
matras...@aol.com wrote, on 18/Oct/12 20:10 | Oct18: The Quanta site has been down for at least 2 days. Has Quanta closed down? Regards Duncan The domain is still valid: Domain name: quanta.org.uk Registrant: Mr John Gilpin for QUANTA Registrant

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-22 Thread Ralf Reköndt
RETurn ferr 12560 END DEFine file_test I set the data_default to , so I really know, if the file exists or not. Cheers...Ralf - Original Message - From: Ralf Reköndt ralf.rekoe...@t-online.de To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 6:50 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-21 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:00:18 +0200 schreef Daniele Terdina danieleterd...@hotmail.com: SuQcess starts with testing the validity of devices and directories to prevent it from crashing later. For this the TK2 commands FTEST and FTYP are used but these don't seem to work on the device names used

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-21 Thread Ralf Reköndt
Hmm, but the TK2 Manual states about OPEN_DIR, so, apart from Level 2, it should be possible. But what kind of directory, if not Level 2? Perhaps just the root one. Section 10 Open and Close The standard QL channel OPEN commands are redefined by Toolkit II to use the data directory. In

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Some years back QLToday wrote about testing the machine you are using by reading the sys_vars (PEEK (sv +167)). The test on Q-emulator returns zero, as the standard QL, so this could be used to assume there is no Level2 device. This number is held in the 5 lowest bits, I believe 14, 15, 18 to 23,

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-21 Thread Tony firshman
On 21 Apr 2012, at 10:10, Ralf Reköndt ralf.rekoe...@t-online.de wrote: snip CLOSE #channelsclose channels What is the syntax? close #2,#3 ? Tony -- t...@firshman.co.ukhttp://firshman.co.uk Voice: +44 (0) 1442 828254 Fax: +44 (0) 1442

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-21 Thread Ralf Reköndt
Yes. From: Tony firshman (Fom TK2 manual...) CLOSE #channelsclose channels What is the syntax? close #2,#3 ? ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-21 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:10:15 +0200 schreef Ralf Reköndt ralf.rekoe...@t-online.de: Hmm, but the TK2 Manual states about OPEN_DIR, so, apart from Level 2, it should be possible. But what kind of directory, if not Level 2? Perhaps just the root one. Section 10 Open and Close The

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-21 Thread Ralf Reköndt
, that the correct device was opened. That's why it is better, to set the Data default to , then try, then set it back to where it was before. - Original Message - From: Bob Spelten b...@upcmail.nl To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2012 5:43 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-20 Thread Daniele Terdina
SuQcess starts with testing the validity of devices and directories to prevent it from crashing later. For this the TK2 commands FTEST and FTYP are used but these don't seem to work on the device names used by Q-emuLator. Is this just an issue with the non-registered version? Is there

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-17 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:55:38 +0200 schreef Daniele Terdina danieleterd...@hotmail.com: My tests were done on a W$-Vista with Q-emuLator 2.5 and 3.1., with JS and both the old DATA_bin and latest 2.13. Only 3.1 JS produces the errors, the DATA_bin version makes no difference. I looks

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-16 Thread Norman Dunbar
Morning all, A few comments, it seems to have been busy on here over the weekend. ;-) On 15/04/12 13:47, Dilwyn Jones wrote: The bad parameter error is related to a file system TRAP#3 call with D0=$44. Do you know what this trap is supposed to do? The trap in question is the only trap

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-16 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:35:15 +0200 schreef Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk: Morning all, A few comments, it seems to have been busy on here over the weekend. ;-) On 15/04/12 13:47, Dilwyn Jones wrote: The bad parameter error is related to a file system TRAP#3 call with D0=$44. Do you

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-16 Thread Rich Mellor
On 16/04/2012 12:19, Bob Spelten wrote: Op Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:35:15 +0200 schreef Norman Dunbar nor...@dunbar-it.co.uk: Morning all, A few comments, it seems to have been busy on here over the weekend. ;-) On 15/04/12 13:47, Dilwyn Jones wrote: The bad parameter error is related to a file

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-16 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 16/04/12 12:56, Rich Mellor wrote: I have forwarded the files and details to Daniele so that he can investigate further. Aha, this means I'm off the hook, for now! ;-) Cheers, Norm. PS. I have downloaded Q-Emulator and I've also tested it with JS and Minerva ROMS. Same problems as

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-16 Thread Lee Privett
*Quote* *PS. I have downloaded Q-Emulator and I've also tested it with JS and Minerva ROMS. Same problems as everyone, JS fails. One thing is exceedingly clear, we didn't half put up with really slow responses back in 1984 didn't we? God it's slow in QL mode! ;-)* Bear in mind a 30 second advert

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-16 Thread Norman Dunbar
Hi Lee, ... Tolerance and expectation are the norm Norm. Nah, it's just I'm used to faster now that I have QPC. I remember the days of loading programs off microdrive. It was ok until I got a Trump card, then it was far too slow! Then I upgraded to a Gold Card, QXL, QPC and so on, getting

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-16 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Norman Dunbar wrote: The BB QL emulated or not, is still faster than a Windows PC booting up from power on, isn't it? It is, yes, booting even from hibernation too. But you only boot once, unless you are running Windows and/or you are Dilwyn (!) it's how responsive it is when it's running

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-16 Thread Daniele Terdina
My tests were done on a W$-Vista with Q-emuLator 2.5 and 3.1., with JS and both the old DATA_bin and latest 2.13. Only 3.1 JS produces the errors, the DATA_bin version makes no difference. I looks like something changed between Q-emuLator 2.5 3.1 to stop DBAS from working. Bob

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-15 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Have you tried a more recent version of DATA_BIN? The supplied one is so old there is no version number, now 2.13 (21/2/98). Bob Have tried v2.13 of DATA_BIN dbase handler on Q-emuLator, and got the following results: 1. works ok on version JM ROM 2. fails on version JS supplied with

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Library Guide

2012-04-15 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Daniele has looked at this issue and to quote his comments: The bad parameter error is related to a file system TRAP#3 call with D0=$44. Do you know what this trap is supposed to do? Here's the Trap #3 d0=$44 notes for the DATAREF_DOC document from DBAS. Dilwyn

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta name - was OT - The great man - Steve Jobs

2011-10-10 Thread Dilwyn Jones
... The QL was quite the reverse - it was so trouble-prone it *demanded* tinkering at every level. That is what made (and makes) it so attractive, and gave Quanta its name - Isn't QL Users and Tinkerers Assocation? The group's name was originally IQLUG (Indepent QL Users Group) and QUANTA was

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Website Down

2011-04-12 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 12/04/11 11:05, Rich Mellor wrote: I see the Quanta website is just displaying a blank home page at the moment. View Source shows something is there, the head and body are both empty though. I suspect someone may be doing an upgrade? I'm not sure if the TYPO3 system puts up a holding page,

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Website Down

2011-04-12 Thread Tony Firshman
Norman Dunbar wrote, on 12/Apr/11 11:09 | Apr12: On 12/04/11 11:05, Rich Mellor wrote: I see the Quanta website is just displaying a blank home page at the moment. View Source shows something is there, the head and body are both empty though. I suspect someone may be doing an upgrade? I'm not

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread Dilwyn Jones
There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for the AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which has delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents will be made available at

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Dilwyn Jones wrote: There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for the AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which has delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents will

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread Rich Mellor
On 22/03/2011 12:52, John Gilpin wrote: out 6 years, hoping that a person would volunteer to take on this very exacting role - literally jumped into the deep end early in February and (with a little assistance) produced a very creditable issue, only to find that she had so much material left

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-22 Thread Klaus Frank og Vita Frank
How come, I am recieving all mails in double, except those from you. Yours Klaus - Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 3:34 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM Two people independently proofread QL

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Committee email address

2011-03-22 Thread Dilwyn Jones
John Gilpin wrote: Please use committee@qua...@org.uk for All communications intended for any member of the QUANTA Committee where a guaranteed response is required. This should read

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Committee email address

2011-03-22 Thread gdgqler
On 22 Mar 2011, at 12:11, John Gilpin wrote: Please use committee@qua...@org.uk for All communications intended for any member of the QUANTA Committee where a guaranteed response is required. Do

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread gdgqler
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote: There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM - it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those members who normally receive a

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread Rich Mellor
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote: On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote: There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM - it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread gdgqler
On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote: On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote: On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote: There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM - it

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread Rich Mellor
On 22/03/2011 15:13, gdgqler wrote: On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote: On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote: On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote: There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread gdgqler
On 22 Mar 2011, at 15:17, Rich Mellor wrote: I do tend to agree with this point, as it does allow for the dismissal of directors - however, the constitution is silent, and this should form part of the discussion about the constitution at the AGM. Clause 8.13 of the QUANTA Constitution

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Rich Mellor wrote: Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election? It doesn't matter who you vote for or against in national elections. A government always gets in ;-) Dilwyn Jones ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread David Tubbs
At 15:26 22/03/2011 +, you wrote: Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election? You can, it's called tactical voting I am unlikely to see the agenda for the AGM, is there an item :- When and in which brewery to hild the next piss0up

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.

2011-03-22 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Rich Mellor r...@rwapservices.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:17 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error. Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election? One part

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-21 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: John Taylor j_taylo...@btinternet.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:18 PM To: QLUsers ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM I have received my March Quanta magazine and it includes two copies of the Income Expenditure

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-21 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: John Taylor j_taylo...@btinternet.com Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:18 PM To: QLUsers ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM I have received my March Quanta magazine and it includes two copies of the Income Expenditure

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Two people independently proofread QL Today and we never make a mistake as Dilwyn, Dylwin and Dyllwin can all testify, Best Wishes, Geoff No, Geoff, all three of us concur ;-) Deliwinn Jonse P.S. BTW, why 2 copies of the email? ___ QL-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-21 Thread Rich Mellor
On 21/03/2011 14:34, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Two people independently proofread QL Today and we never make a mistake as Dilwyn, Dylwin and Dyllwin can all testify, Best Wishes, Geoff No, Geoff, all three of us concur ;-) Deliwinn Jonse P.S. BTW, why 2 copies of the email?

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-21 Thread gdgqler
On 21 Mar 2011, at 12:18, John Taylor wrote: I have received my March Quanta magazine and it includes two copies of the Income Expenditure A/C. Pages 35 36, but there is no copy of the Balance Sheet. This may be a One Off, but I doubt it, as pages 35 36 are back to back. No Balance

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-21 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 2:34 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM Two people independently proofread QL Today and we never make a mistake as Dilwyn, Dylwin

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Geoff Wicks wrote: Two people independently proofread QL Today and we never make a mistake as Dilwyn, Dylwin and Dyllwin can all testify, Best Wishes, Geoff No, Geoff, all three of us concur ;-) Deliwinn Jonse P.S. BTW, why 2 copies of the email? Because Quanta usually ignores what I

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta AGM

2011-03-21 Thread David Tubbs
At 14:34 21/03/2011 +, you wrote: Deliwinn Jonse P.S. BTW, why 2 copies of the email? Stereo ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta News

2011-03-02 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message 54C712DAAB5F41208F437F6B07441D2C@d3hkh9x94, Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk writes Hi Dilwyn, Just to keep you busy with some 'copy' ... :-) The London QL Quanta Group started 2011 with its first Meeting of the Year on our new schedule - Sunday 13th February 2011.

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread Norman Dunbar
Morning Dilwyn, On 30/12/10 17:10, Dilwyn Jones wrote: I'd be interested in finding out who hasn't yet received their PRINTED Quanta magazine. It's not just Quanta. My QL Today is still not in my sticky little hands! And I'm not really all that far from Chester! Cheers, Norman. -- Norman

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread Tony Firshman
QL-MyLink-DT wrote, on 30/Dec/10 20:50 | Dec30: I know.. I know... Dilwyn said hasn't! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date? aaah... that's far too

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread P Witte
Tony Firshman wrote: QL-MyLink-DT wrote, on 30/Dec/10 20:50 | Dec30: I know.. I know... Dilwyn said hasn't! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date?

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread Dilwyn Jones
John in Wales wrote: I know.. I know... Dilwyn said hasn't! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date? aaah... that's far too smudged to read - even

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread gdgqler
On 30 Dec 2010, at 20:50, QL-MyLink-DT wrote: I know.. I know... Dilwyn said hasn't! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc. etc. On which date? aaah... that's

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread Billy
On 31/12/2010 09:27, Tony Firshman wrote: QL-MyLink-DT wrote, on 30/Dec/10 20:50 | Dec30: I know.. I know... Dilwyn said hasn't! But, as I'm John in Wales and West of Chester. I report that I recieved my QUANTA yesterday (Wednesday), bearing an 'audit trail' - Manchester 07.08 pm. etc.

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread P Witte
Dilwyn Jones wrote: As I now have mail for half my street I'd better become a postman for the day... if I've got post for half the street, who's got the other half of my mail??? G. It was Per the Norwegian who ate the reindeer, honest...I only wrote the Santa game... (there, back on

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread Dilwyn Jones
As I now have mail for half my street I'd better become a postman for the day... if I've got post for half the street, who's got the other half of my mail??? G. It was Per the Norwegian who ate the reindeer, honest...I only wrote the Santa game... (there, back on topic). As to that, you

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:10:30 +0100 schreef Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk: I'd be interested in finding out who hasn't yet received their PRINTED Quanta magazine. My Quanta Magazine arrived in Amsterdam (south-east of Chester) just before Christmas. QL Today took till the 29th

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Dilwyn Jones dil...@evans1511.fsnet.co.uk Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2010 5:10 PM To: ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags 1 I'm trying to build up some form of picture as to where in the UK there are outstanding

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta mags

2010-12-31 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Geoff Wicks wrote: People who went to the sorting centre - one of the biggest in the Midlands - to collect their post were told that was impossible - It's chaos in there. We wouldn't know where to look. I can fully understand that - so they should make that the official reason and TELL people.

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

2010-06-19 Thread John Sadler
Hi SQLUG meets every second Sunday in the month throughout the year. As we are a small group it is occasionally moved to suit the members. Visitors are welcome but please contact George Gwilt at 0131 445 1266 first. On Friday 18 June 2010 18:32, Malcolm Cadman wrote: Hi, Following this up.

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

2010-06-19 Thread gdgqler
On 18 Jun 2010, at 19:32, Malcolm Cadman wrote: 5 - Scottish - George Gwilt's home. Meet second Sunday of every month. 12 times a Year ? Yes George ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

2010-06-19 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message memo.20100618202512.12...@cave612, Christopher Cave cave...@btinternet.com writes Hi Chris, Good ...Pleased to hear that you are still Meeting as a Group . :-) Malcolm knows very well that I am still alive, so perhaps he ought not to be quite so definite about the alleged

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

2010-06-18 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Malcolm Cadman q...@mcad.demon.co.uk Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 7:32 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued 2 - Dorset - No described location. Meet on the second Sunday of every month,

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

2010-06-18 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Christopher Cave cave...@btinternet.com Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 8:25 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued Malcolm knows very well that I am still alive, so perhaps he ought not to be

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

2010-06-18 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Malcolm knows very well that I am still alive, so perhaps he ought not to be quite so definite about the alleged demise of the Surrey group. Yes, we are reduced in numbers but we do still meet about once a month on a Wednesday evening. We are coy about where since it depends on the generosity

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival - continued

2010-06-18 Thread Roy Wood
On 18/06/2010 20:37, Dilwyn Jones wrote: Roy - I take it you want the Sussex group entry removed, then? Unless someone else has convened a group - yes. -- Roy Wood ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival

2010-06-09 Thread Geoff Wicks
-- From: Malcolm Cadman q...@mcad.demon.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:57 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival Overall a good number of subgroups, yet two definitely meet at someone's home, and three

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival

2010-06-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Manchester is the largest of the subgroups and you have to touch your forelock when you meet them because they are also the Quanta toffs. (Quanta is shortly to be renamed the External Affairs Branch of the North East Manchester QL User Group). For a large group they are surprisingly silent

Re: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups - Survival

2010-06-09 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message ce65970b0d324a6c93c30293dadae...@geoffbqm5ccx41, Geoff Wicks gtwi...@btinternet.com writes -- From: Malcolm Cadman q...@mcad.demon.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:57 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: [Ql-Users] Quanta Subgroups -

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-18 Thread David Tubbs
It all seems thoroughly Quantesque, Still, if it will hardly matter if the results are published as widely as the last one. At 18:20 17/02/2010 +, you wrote: On Wednesday 17 Feb 2010 17:27:09 Derek Stewart wrote: I selected option 1, which I took to be; I Strongly Agree I will be

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread gdgqler
On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Hm!! I thought that 5 was strongly agree. George

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread Stephen
On 17/02/2010 15:44, gdgqler wrote: On 16 Feb 2010, at 21:52, Derek Stewart wrote: Just done the Survey on my Ubuntu box, all seems to go fine. The only thing I could see wrong was the scale of 1-5 was missing, I selected 1 as strongly agree Hm!! I thought that 5 was strongly agree.

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:09:54 +0100 schreef John Gilpin thegilp...@btinternet.com: Please spend a few minutes filling in the survey (no personal details are required) This will enable QUANTA to better support its members and the QL fraternity as a whole. Looking through the questionnaire a

Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Survey

2010-02-17 Thread Tony Firshman
Bob Spelten wrote: Op Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:09:54 +0100 schreef John Gilpin thegilp...@btinternet.com: snip Looking through the list for the second time I could not find this item again and may have submitted the incomplete survey by mistake, so please ignore. How can they ignore it? They

  1   2   3   >